GORDON Brown’s think tank Our Scottish Future and campaign group These Islands are among the groups “named and shamed for their secrecy” around who funds them.
The pro-Union Scottish Business UK and the Centre for the Union were also given the lowest possible score in a new report listing the transparency of various think tanks and campaign groups.
Pro-independence think tank Common Weal and campaign group Business for Scotland were both marked at the opposite end of the scale – but the Scottish Independence Convention joined the Unionist groups at the bottom.
Reform Scotland, the think tank chaired by former Labour first minister Jack McConnell, was also given the lowest possible grade.
READ MORE: 'Dark money' Scottish Unionist group hands Tories almost £100k in one year
The scores come from a report by openDemocracy, which has graded think tanks from A to E in a newly published “Who Funds You” audit.
The news site said the audit showed that “more than a quarter of the money that has been donated to think tanks focused on the devolved areas of the UK can be considered dark money”.
However, the four Unionist groups given the lowest E grade do not disclose even how much funding they are in receipt of, meaning it is impossible to know the true figures.
Of Brown’s Our Scottish Future, the audit states: “The organisation publishes no information on its donors and lists a firm of solicitors as its main director. This makes it impossible to know for certain who controls or funds it.”
Of These Islands, the audit says: “Its staff regularly feature in the media, and their research has had an impact on debate at Holyrood, but there is no indication on its website of who supports it, what income it has or what purpose money was provided for.”
And of the Centre for the Union, which was incorporated in Scotland but mainly focuses on Northern Ireland, the report states: “According to Companies House, the Centre for the Union has one director, Ethan Thoburn, who lives in London.
"He is also a parliamentary assistant to a Conservative MP, and has connections to other right-leaning, Tory-linked organisations including The Bruges Group and Orthodox Conservatives.”
OpenDemocracy said in their report: “With passionate views on all sides of the many constitutional debates that are likely to run and run in the UK, it is more important than ever that the organisations that seek to play a role in influencing public opinion are open about who is funding them, if they are to be viewed as trustworthy actors.”
The SNP said the groups given the lowest E grade had been “named and shamed for their secrecy around donations and where their money comes from”.
Tommy Sheppard (above) the party’s constitution spokesperson at Westminster, said: “What do Unionist groups have to hide about who donates to them and where their money comes from?
“It is important for the public to know this as these groups try and influence government policy and the future of Scottish politics.
“We have no idea who is backing the interests of these Unionist think tanks but the public deserve the right to know because of the considerable influence they can wield.
READ MORE: Tory links to Russian money must be dealt with 'immediately', say MPs
“The Tories have had serious questions to answer for a long time on who they are funded by, they have been surrounded by issues with dark money and foreign donations for a very long time. Yet, still we do not have the answers to that very basic question – who funds you?
“It is about time the Tories and the Unionist groups associated with them open the books and show us who is lining their pockets. If not, they will raise even more questions than answers.”
OpenDemocracy’s full report can be downloaded and read here.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel