CONTROVERSIAL voter ID laws will be challenged by a legal activist group, it has been announced.
The Good Law Project has announced it will monitor the effects of the Tories’ voter ID laws – which critics say could see millions disenfranchised because they do not have the right form of identification – and challenge the plans in court.
Jo Maugham KC, the executive director of the organisation, said the new rules were a “needless act of sabotage against the universality of the franchise”.
They became law in 2022 and mean voters now need to prove their identity before casting their ballots.
Maugham said: “The voter ID rules are a really bad thing to happen in a democracy - a needless act of sabotage against the universality of the franchise.
“On the evidence, they cannot be explained otherwise than as an attempt to deny those likely to vote against the Government the ability to do so.
"They need to be challenged, in court. And this is exactly what we plan to do."
READ MORE: Activists warn up to two million could be turned away at upcoming General Election
Critics of the plans said young people were more likely to be denied their right to vote by the rules, pointing out that while forms of ID such as an OAP bus pass or a 60+ Oyster Card are accepted at polling stations, 18+ Oyster Cards and 16-25 railcards are not.
The UK Government brought in a new voter authority certificate to make it easier for people to produce acceptable identification – but the Good Law Project said it estimated around 4% of the estimated 2.1 million people who did not have valid ID had applied for the certificate.
The Scottish Government is opposed to the plans, calling them “voter suppression” and in a vote early last year MSPs voted to refuse consent for the rules.
Voters north of the Border will not need to provide ID to cast their ballots in Scottish Parliament elections – though they will in UK General Elections.
A spokesperson for the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities said: "It’s vital we keep our democracy secure and anyone casting their vote in person for local elections will need to bring an accepted form of photographic identification.
“The vast majority of people already have a form of acceptable identification – which includes driving licences, blue badges, NUS Totum cards and Freedom passes.
“This change brings the rest of the UK in line with Northern Ireland, which has had photo identification to vote in elections since 2003, and will ensure that elections are better protected from the potential for voter fraud.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel