THE UK Government is facing increased demands to properly explore the effects of leaving the EU amid what is believed to be the first debate on the impact of Brexit after leaving the bloc.
MPs on Monday debated calls for an inquiry into the impact of Brexit after the government previously rejected a call for an official probe into the effects of leaving the EU.
Brexit and its impacts have been discussed repeatedly in the House of Commons, but it is thought this is the first time a full debate had been scheduled to discuss it specifically.
Speaking ahead of the debate, the SNP’s Europe spokesperson Alyn Smith said: “It is clear to see that Brexit has made the UK meaner, poorer and weaker. The Brexit campaign promised everything and unsurprisingly failed to deliver anything.
"The people of Scotland voted decisively to remain in the European Union yet have been forced out against their will. Brexit has been bad for our businesses, bad for our universities and bad for our communities. No wonder then that 72% of Scots want back in the EU.
READ MORE: Jacob Rees-Mogg calls for 'Brexit prosperity' amid economic turmoil
"The SNP supports this call for a public inquiry into the impact of Brexit. We want to see the UK have as close, deep and functional relationship with our European friends. The UK being honest with itself about how it got into this mess would be a good start for how it gets out of it."
MPs discussed a petition calling for an independent public inquiry into the effects of Brexit started by Peter Packham, a member of the European Movement campaign group.
He said: “This will be the first time that MPs have had an opportunity to debate the impact of Brexit, which is an extraordinary place to be three years after leaving the EU.
“A public inquiry into the impact of Brexit is crucial for our country and our democracy.
“The public has the right to know the outcome of this historic decision and our ability to move forward must be informed by the full knowledge of what has happened so far, what is likely to happen in the future and what steps must be taken to mitigate any negative impacts.
“Holding a full, independent public inquiry should not be a controversial request.”
READ MORE: Brexit a bigger worry for small businesses than climate change, report finds
Tory MP Tobias Ellwood, the chair of the Defence Select Committee, said: “More and more people are questioning Boris Johnson’s Brexit deal. What parliament must realise is that this deal is up for review in 2025. Are we really going to say, ‘Nothing to see here?’
“What we need now is a balance of consequences review - an opportunity for stakeholders to review all the aspects and outcomes of Brexit. An inquiry is a crucial part of that review process and should be arranged as swiftly as possible.”
Labour MP Clive Lewis added: “We need an independent public inquiry to map out the impact so we can, collectively as a country, work out how to fix the myriad problems. The formal review of the UK-EU trade and cooperation agreement is coming up in just two years. Surely we want to be well prepared for that and not cluelessly stumble into those negotiations with our heads in the sand.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel