THE introduction of buffer zones around abortion clinics is expected to be backed by Scotland’s largest trade union body.
A motion is being brought forward by the University and College Union (UCU) on Tuesday which the Scottish Trades Union Congress will be asked to support.
If buffer zones are implemented, anti-abortion protests will not be allowed within 150m of hospitals or clinics where terminations take place.
The STUC says the motion will put pressure on the Scottish Government to speed up the process of implementing the zones “protecting patients from harassment and intimidation”.
READ MORE: Rare whisky chosen by Doddie Weir released to raise funds for MND
Lena Wanggren, UCU representative and mover of the motion, told STV News: “We brought this forward as we believe it is sadly very much needed and timely, as reproductive rights – especially abortion rights – are increasingly attacked. And now we in Scotland have a very good opportunity to protect both healthcare workers and those accessing services.
“I know a woman who started miscarrying at work but who didn’t dare tell her colleagues or employer as she was precariously employed on a fixed term contract.
“She was scared that if her employer knew she was trying to get pregnant then she wouldn’t have her contract renewed.
“This is a good example of how reproductive rights are a workplace and trade union issue, while noting that insecure working conditions (which disproportionately affect women) impact reproductive rights.”
“I am very confident that the buffer zones motion will be passed.”
First Minister Humza Yousaf said during his first week in office he “unequivocally” backed Gillian Mackay’s Safe Access Zones Bill, which is expected to be formally introduced to Parliament in the coming weeks.
A Scottish Government spokesperson said: “The First Minister met with Gillian Mackay MSP during his first full week in office to discuss the progress on introducing safe access zones in Scotland and ensuring women can access healthcare free from intimidation, harassment or unwanted influence.
“During that productive meeting, he made clear that Scottish Government support for Ms Mackay’s Members’ Bill is unequivocal and unwavering.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here