MARGARET Ferrier, the formerly SNP MP who broke Covid laws, has appealed a recommendation that she be suspended from the House of Commons for 30 days.
It is not clear the grounds on which Ferrier is basing her appeal, which was lodged on the same day as the deadline.
The Standards Committee had recommended the MP for Rutherglen and Hamilton West be suspended for 30 days after she knowingly travelled from England to Scotland while positive for Covid-19.
If MPs approve a suspension of 10 days or longer, there is a possibility of a by-election. It would be triggered if 10% of Ferrier’s constituents – around 8000 people – signed a petition ending her time as their MP.
READ MORE: SNP 'pretend' to want by-election in Margaret Ferrier's seat, Anas Sarwar claims
Scottish Labour are eager to see such a by-election happen, because they are confident the seat is winnable for them. But Ferrier’s appeal means any vote will be pushed back. It is unlikely to happen until August at the very earliest, and could be as late as this winter.
Ferrier’s appeal was lodged on Monday, with the Independent Expert Panel (IEP) writing to Speaker Lindsay Hoyle to notify him.
Stephen Irwin, the chair of the IEP, wrote: “I write in relation to the Committee on Standards’ Ninth Report to the House, Margaret Ferrier, HC 1276, published on 30 March; and pursuant to paragraph 88 of the Procedural Protocol in respect of the Code of Conduct that requires me to notify you whether Margaret Ferrier has appealed the Committee’s decision to the Independent Expert Panel.
“I can confirm that Margaret Ferrier has submitted an appeal.”
Ferrier has already been given a 270-hour community payback order by a court after admitting culpably and recklessly exposing the public “to the risk of infection, illness and death”.
There has never been a by-election in Scotland after a recall petition.
Ferrier has been asked for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel