The UK Government is keeping nuclear secrets from the Scottish Government.
The Ministry of Defence (MoD) won't give its reasons for not releasing annual assessments of the safety of nuclear weapons on the Clyde, The Ferret revealed.
Annual reports from the MoD’s internal watchdog, the Defence Nuclear Safety Regulator (DNSR), were released for 10 years before stopping in 2017. An appeal to a UK tribunal to force the MoD to release the reports again was rejected in 2021.
The Scottish Government called for Westminster to be "open and transparent in its actions around the handling of nuclear materials in Scotland".
The Scottish Greens described the secrecy involved as “outrageous, undemocratic and frankly dangerous”.
The Ferret previously revealed that the reports for 2005 to 2015 highlighted “regulatory risks” 86 times, including 13 rated as high priority.
Now the MoD has rejected another freedom of information request asking for documents that explain why they are refusing to release the DNSR reports.
The MoD said it had used an exemption under freedom of information law aimed at preventing damage to relations between UK administrations. The exemption had been applied to information “which relates to the basing of the nuclear deterrent in Scotland”, it explained in a letter to a campaigner in January 2023.
READ MORE: Anas Sarwar calls Scottish Labour ‘election ready’ as he revamps team
The letter added: “There is a strong public interest in reassuring the public, especially in Scotland, that the nuclear deterrent is maintained and operated safely.
"However, any misinterpretation of the information, due to an incomplete picture, could lead to further anti-nuclear arguments from the Scottish Government, which is already strongly in favour of removing the nuclear deterrent from Scotland.”
The MoD said that “the balance of public interest” was in favour of withholding the information “as its release would prejudice relations between the UK and Scottish governments.”
The Scottish Greens warned that withholding information that may support arguments against nuclear weapons poses a “clear and present danger” politically. They also argued that the people of Scotland have a “fundamental right” to know the risks they face from hosting weapons of mass destruction on the Clyde.
Green MSP Mark Ruskell said: “The extraordinary admission in this letter that the MoD and UK Government are actively concealing key pieces of information from the Scottish Government is outrageous, undemocratic and frankly dangerous.
“The MoD is basically saying they won't share this information because they are scared Scotland won't like it and it might upset the US. You simply can't get any more totalitarian than that and this should be challenged further.”
“If they want to reassure people that there are no unnecessary added dangers, they should share the information urgently and transparently. If not they should pack up and ship out. Scotland doesn't want nukes here and they know it.”
The Scottish Government repeated its opposition to the possession of nuclear weapons and its support for world-wide nuclear disarmament.
“In order to retain the confidence of this government and the Scottish public, the Ministry of Defence should be open and transparent in its actions around the handling of nuclear materials in Scotland,” said a spokesperson.
An MoD spokesperson said: “The release of information on nuclear safety must strike a balance between recognising public interest in nuclear safety matters and protecting information about our nuclear systems.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel