A BRITISH columnist has called the search of Peter Murrell and Nicola Sturgeon’s home “over the top” with “no justification for staging a heavy-handed dawn raid”.
In the piece, published under the headline “Even I am appalled at McPlod’s raid on Wee Burney”, Richard Littlejohn gave an overview of the Murrell investigation before focusing on the behaviour of Police Scotland seen across the UK during the week.
Littlejohn described Scotland as “Two Doors Down country, not Mar-a-Lago” when questioning the number of police officers present at Murrell’s home over two days and said there was “no justification for staging a heavy-handed dawn raid”.
He added: “Police Scotland seem to have taken their cue from the FBI raid on Donald Trump’s compound in Palm Beach, Florida, last summer.
"Welcome to Mac-a-Lago.”
Littlejohn writes a twice-weekly column for the British tabloid from his home in Florida and has previously written for the Spectator.
He clarifies in the column that he has “nothing but contempt for Sturgeon” as well as Murrell, however he “is entitled to due process — not a show trial in the court of public opinion, courtesy of Police Scotland”.
The columnist goes on to ask why the Murrell case is “such a priority”, where the resources for the search are coming from when Police Scotland has suffered heavy budget cuts, as well as question what officers were looking for.
Littlejohn writes: “Dozens of officers were involved, carrying spades and tarpaulin sheets, hauling away boxes of ‘evidence’, even searching a barbecue grill at one stage.
READ MORE: SNP auditors quit after Peter Murrell police investigation
"They searched the house from top to bottom, looking for what exactly? No doubt they also trawled through Nicola’s knicker drawer. CSI-style crime scene tape sealed off the property as burly, grim-faced McPlods in ubiquitous hi-viz jackets stood guard.
"Yesterday morning, there were still 20 coppers on the scene. Doing what, precisely?”
A number of Daily Mail subscribers agreed with Littlejohn in the comments. One wrote: “it appeared to be an intrusive look at their home” whilst another highlighted the “misreporting” during the search.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article