THE body responsible for setting sentencing guidelines has defended its rules following public outcry sparked by a child rapist dodging jail.
The Scottish Sentencing Council, a body which is not controlled by the Government, was responsible for setting the lenient guidelines for young offenders which allowed Judge Lord Lake to spare Sean Hogg from jail – despite being found guilty of raping a 13-year-old girl.
The 21-year-old walked from Glasgow High Court with a 270-hour community payback order on Monday because the judge referred to sentencing guidelines drawn up by the body which instructed him to pay heed to the potential for rehabilitation of young offenders and their immaturity.
Top Scottish human rights lawyer Aamer Anwar pointed out on social media on Tuesday the judge would have been able to send Hogg to prison under the current rules.
READ MORE: Petition calls for child rapist Sean Hogg to be imprisoned after dodging jail
The Scottish Sentencing Council defended its policies in a statement to the press, arguing they were backed by independent research conducted by psychologists at Edinburgh University.
The council also said it was in the process of drawing up guidelines for sentencing rapists, on which members of the public could submit their views through a consultation.
A spokesperson for the organisation said: “The Sentencing Young People guideline has been approved by the High Court and is based on robust, independently-assessed evidence from around the world into the cognitive development of young people.
“The guideline makes it clear that the full range of sentencing options remains open to the court, including imprisonment.
“It also states that because young people have a greater capacity to change rehabilitation should, where appropriate, be a primary consideration to reduce the risk of reoffending.
READ MORE: Humza Yousaf questioned as Scottish child rapist avoids prison sentence
“The sentencing decision in any individual case is always for the independent judge and will be based upon the unique circumstances of the case. When considering a case, a judge must always consider the harm caused to the victim as well as the culpability and circumstances of the offender.
“Sentencing guidelines are just that – guidelines. Where appropriate a judge can decide not to follow a guideline, but must give their reasons.
“The council is currently developing a guideline on sentencing rape offences. This will include a full public consultation. Responses will be carefully considered before a draft guideline is submitted to the High Court for approval.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel