HUMZA Yousaf has the “power to govern” without an election, his campaign manager has said as he faces calls for a ballot from opposition parties.
The new SNP leader is expected to be voted into the post of Scottish first minister by MSPs on Tuesday afternoon, becoming the youngest person to hold the position and the first from an ethnic minority background.
Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar has called for Yousaf to go to the country in a Holyrood election, claiming he does not have a mandate.
Rejecting the idea, Neil Gray – Yousaf’s campaign manager and a key supporter – said the new leader already has the “power to govern”.
He told BBC Radio Scotland on Tuesday morning: “The democratically-elected MSPs who choose the first minister through a ballot in the Scottish Parliament have that opportunity to do so today.
READ MORE: 'I'll clip him round the ear': Humza Yousaf's mum in joke about her son
“This is a different situation than what we faced when Gordon Brown took over from Tony Blair, for instance, where there wasn’t an election or, indeed, the various Conservative leaders who have been elected by the party over the last few years.
“I think Humza has a very clear mandate, I think that will be earned by his election today, and he absolutely has the power to govern going forward.”
Support from the Scottish Greens in Holyrood – pledged in the hours after Yousaf’s victory – is expected to usher him into Bute House with little controversy.
Opposition politicians can put themselves up to become first minister in the Tuesday afternoon session at Holyrood, but they face long odds to win the contest.
READ MORE: Stephen Flynn plays down extent of divisions in SNP
Scottish Conservative leader Douglas Ross will is set to be his party’s nominee, and he told Good Morning Scotland that he would focus on the NHS, the cost-of-living crisis, the economy and education – while claiming Yousaf has the “wrong priorities for Scotland”.
One of the first big tests for Yousaf is his approach to gender reforms passed by Holyrood but blocked by the UK Government in January.
He has repeatedly said he would challenge that move in court and seek to put the controversial Bill on to the statute book – although in the latter phases of the SNP leadership campaign he said he would not push ahead with a challenge if legal advice said it could not be won.
SNP Westminster leader Stephen Flynn, speaking to Sky News, described the move to block the Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill as a “democratic blocker”, while his deputy Mhairi Black said the legislation is “not controversial”, claiming “a lot of the criticisms of it, I think, are based on misinformation or people not having an idea of what the full picture is”.
She added: “What this is about is pointing out that Westminster can’t just keep riding roughshod over the Scottish Parliament.
“This is something that is completely within the devolved capabilities and yet the UK Government and a Tory government we have not voted for is telling us that they can dictate what laws we can make in Scotland, and I don’t think that is right.”
Gray, who was singled out for thanks by Yousaf in his acceptance speech and described as his “corner man”, also told Times Radio: “I think there is an important principle at stake here.
“Of course he is going to listen to the legal advice – he has to do that – but there is an important principle at stake which is about the democracy and the democratic mandate given to the Scottish Parliament that must be defended.
“A two-thirds majority passed the Gender Recognition Bill in the Scottish Parliament.
“We must defend Scottish democracy and devolution. Otherwise, what is the point?”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel