THE SNP Trade Union Group (TUG) has said it has concerns about the direction of Kate Forbes’s “economic thinking” as leaders insisted they want an early meeting with whoever wins the SNP contest.
Ten key questions were set out by the group for Humza Yousaf, Forbes and Ash Regan on industrial and related issues.
The group told The National it received a late response from Forbes on Friday - having already got responses from Regan and Yousaf a few days before - but secretary Simon Barrow said her answers were “sometimes difficult to parse” and insisted he had concerns over the “detail and direction of her economic thinking”.
Convener Bill Ramsay said an early meeting with whoever wins the race on Monday will be crucial to discuss major policy issues and ensure the voices of working people are being understood.
READ MORE: Kate Forbes 'relaxed' about prospect of minority government
Barrow said he welcomed certain commitments from Forbes such as her promise to face down the Tories’ anti-strike bill and pause and rethink the National Care Service.
But he added many of the ideas Forbes talked about did not chime with the group’s values.
Barrow told The National: “The answers we received from Kate were thoughtful and ambitious, but sometimes difficult to parse. We look forward to clarifying more fully what they will mean in practice.
“We certainly welcome commitments to face down UK anti-strike legislation, to engage with STUC’s work on land, tax and assets, to review port governance (including freeports), to pause and rethink the National Care Service, and ‘to develop our global brands and ensure they pay their fair contribution to the land that nurtures them’.
“However, we believe that government must play a key role in developing, safeguarding and innovating Scotland’s future through economic democracy. This means that capital should be subservient to human and environmental priorities, not the other way round. Likewise, workers and trade unions should be central to industrial policy.
“We are not sure how far Kate sees things that way.
“Talk of ‘the limitations of government’, ‘competitive taxes’ and the instinctive fiscal conservatism of the Growth Commission – which we see as ideology rather than common sense – points in a different direction. But we look forward to constructive engagement on such vital strategic questions.”
The 10 questions covered a range of issues about present Scottish and UK Government policy. They included questions on the economy, local government finance, the role of trade unions, industrial disputes, taxing big whisky profits, Scotwind, just transition to renewable energy, and port strategy.
The questions were sent to all three candidates after they had agreed to the special trade union hustings chaired by STUC general secretary Roz Foyer and organised by the SNPTUG in association with The National.
The Finance Secretary is running for first minister on a platform that is more right-leaning than her rivals. However, she has denied that her leadership would represent a shift to the right for the SNP.
READ MORE: Anas Sarwar: New SNP leader will 'not have mandate' to be first minister
Scotland will find out how the new SNP leader is at around 2pm on Monday, with an announcement organised from Murrayfield Stadium in Edinburgh.
SNP TUG convener Ramsay added: “We will be seeking an early meeting with whoever wins this contest to ensure that the voices, concerns and expertise of working people and their trade unions is understood and valued by the new SNP leader and first minister.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel