A PROMINENT Humza Yousaf-backer has cast doubt on whether he can achieve one of his key policy pledges.
Shona Robison said the Scottish Government had been “limited” by devolution when conducted the controversial ScotWind auction last year – throwing doubt on the SNP leadership hopeful’s promise to require the state to have a 10% stake in future offshore wind projects.
Speaking at the Scotonomics Festival of Economics conference in Dundee on Saturday, the Social Justice Secretary defended the Government’s policy of selling off swathes of the Scottish seabed at what critics said was a discount rate.
The minister said it was the “the best we could within the levers that we have”.
The ScotWind auction was controversial, with pro-Yes think tank Common Weal describing the move as likely to have been a “financial disaster for Scotland” and arguing the public purse had potentially been denied “tens of billions of pounds in auction fees and supply chain developments”.
'We did the best we could'
Robison (below) said: “There are absolutely limitations around what we can do because a lot of levers around energy policy are not ours, a lot of the powers are not ours…
“What I could say to you though is, we were looking at what the expected revenue is going to be from ScotWind and what’s coming down the line in terms of Intog, which is the innovations and targeted oil and gas leasing, which is going to generate significant revenues for the Scottish Government budget over the next few years.
READ MORE: Humza Yousaf vows to fight to the last as SNP leadership race nears close
“So I think we probably did the best we could, in terms of the limitations we have to make sure that we were going to get revenues for the Scottish budget, even under a devolved context.”
She added: “So looking to the future, is there more potential there? Of course there is but I think the best scenario, we did the best we could within the levers that we have and those revenues and Intog as well is going to become really quite important in the future.”
Questioned on whether anything had changed in the devolution settlement to allow the Scottish Government to guarantee more income from future projects, Robison said she did not know but insisted the deal was the best as could have been achieved at the time.
She told The National: “I wasn’t part of the negotiations around that time but as I understand what was gained, in terms of ScotWind, was the best situation that could have been gained at the time.
"I’m aware that during the leadership campaign, Humza Yousaf has talked about trying to take a public stake and that’s something that will need to be explored but I think probably at the time, trying to nail down the contracts around ScotWind, the best deal was gained within the timeframe and the availability of what could be done at that moment in time.”
READ MORE: Humza Yousaf calls for 'equity stake' in next ScotWind round at second hustings
Speaking on the campaign trail earlier on Saturday, Yousaf said last year’s ScotWind auction had been a “tremendous success”.
He said: “What I would say is we’re building upon the legacy. I think ScotWind has been a tremendous success, it’s clearly going to help us in terms of our funding and finance for future years, but I think we can go further.
“It’s about building upon what has been an excellent legacy and a progressive agenda over the last 16 years.”
'Scotland must nationalise renewables'
Craig Dalzell, Common Weal’s head of policy and research who investigated the downsides of the auction, said: “The Scottish Government should be looking at various mechanisms within its power to take equity stakes in ScotWind and, indeed, all renewable energy in Scotland.
“The most direct would be to adopt a "no subsidy" principle on these projects - if companies want or need public investment alongside their own then it should be on the basis of directly buying equity rather than just doling out ‘free’ money.
READ MORE: Scotland may have lost billions in the ScotWind deal - here's what should happen now
“Other opportunities will come along over the next few years as the companies who are already involved in ScotWind develop their projects.
“In common with many large schemes like this, companies will trade their options or shares in their fields with other companies before, during and after construction of the turbines.
“The Scottish Government should look for opportunities to buy in when these trades happen and could even explore demanding first refusal rights on any trades.
“Most importantly though, while an equity-only ‘silent partner’ stake in ScotWind would bring some short and medium-term gain, the long-term potential of Scottish renewables will only be realised if we launch an asset-owned public energy company who can be actively involved in the development and running of these assets and with an intentional strategy to progressively renationalise all of Scotland's renewables so that they can be run for the Scottish public good, not merely for the enrichment of a few shareholders.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel