POLLING expert Sir John Curtice has argued that another independence referendum will happen – because “the Union is in trouble”.
The professor told the New Statesman that he believes a fresh vote on the issue will be held, despite the Supreme Court finding that Holyrood requires Westminster’s permission to stage a referendum.
However, Curtice acknowledged that getting to a ballot “may be quite a while” away.
The political scientist, who is a professor at the University of Strathclyde, explained his reasoning.
READ MORE: John Curtice: Labour gave up on Scotland to focus on English seats
“Half the public want out,” he said. “If you want to save the Union, you have to change public opinion, but making the case means explaining why Brexit is to Scotland’s advantage. Good luck!”
Curtice also said that another EU referendum could happen – but that might be more like two decades away yet.
He thinks the verdict in both votes will be determined by demographic change.
“It’s older people who are in favour of the Union, and who were in favour of Brexit,” he explained.
“You can already see the people who couldn’t vote in 2016 are very strongly in favour [of Remain]. Today’s middle-aged people will have to be persuaded, or these things will become decidedly unpopular.”
READ MORE: Scottish Tories left red-faced as media BANNED from Tory spring forum
Elsewhere in the interview, the professor reflected on the major challenges facing the Conservatives in the polls – who are already around 20 points behind.
“The economic position looks terrible,” he argued. “We’re back to the 1970s, concertina-ed into 12 months. We have industrial unrest, high inflation, fiscal crisis, a dramatic fall in living standards – oh, and by the way, even though we’ve got record taxation and public spending, the service levels are crap.”
Still, Curtice isn’t certain that the next General Election would result in a Blair-style victory for Keir Starmer.
“The electoral system is not operating in Labour’s favour, so even a 20-point lead may not get you to Blair landslide territory,” he said.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel