A BID to slow down M8 traffic to 30 mph as it passes through Glasgow city centre will go in front of the council next week.
Greens councillor Christy Mearns wants the council to ask the Scottish Transport Minister for a six-month trial to cut the speed on city centre sections of the motorway.
As part of a motion to be lodged at a full council meeting, Mearns also hopes to request a “review of powers to extend the low emission zone (LEZ) to motorway roads” and for Transport Scotland to be involved in and help fund research into reducing the impact of the M8.
The motion also asks for a report on existing air quality monitoring along the motorway to be presented to a committee within six months.
READ MORE: Call for Glasgow's M8 to be scrapped and turned into people-friendly green zone
SNP Councillor Angus Millar, convener for climate, Glasgow Green Deal, transport and city centre recovery plans to lodge an amendment to the motion calling for the city centre stretch of the M8 to be re-engineered or downgraded in the long term and replaced with an avenue or boulevard style road.
He has written to the Scottish Government asking for Holyrood to work with the council to scope out short, medium and long-term actions to reduce the impact of the M8 on the city centre and surrounding communities including looking at speed.
Calling for action, Councillor Mearns said: “The M8 motorway has of course brought benefits since its introduction in the 1960s, however it has also entrenched car-use in and around Glasgow, caused physical harm to the communities in its path, and undermined vital targets to reduce vehicle journeys and emissions, as well as air pollution and poor health.
“Alongside better, more coordinated, and affordable, public transport, it is essential that a future and alternative vision for the M8 is developed, not least given the eye-watering public cost of maintaining it as it is.”
Mearns added: “To do this, we need Transport Scotland to agree to a joint piece of work with Glasgow City Council; and we would like immediate actions to be explored which could lower air and noise pollution in the short-term. Other cities have seen transformations from incrementally downgrading or replacing their motorways and we should be urgently exploring it too.”
Councillor Millar said: “The M8 has had a deeply damaging impact on the communities it tore through, and to this day remains a deep scar in the centre of the city. As we begin to think about the long-term future of sustainable transport in Glasgow, it’s time to consider whether a city centre motorway, very much a transport solution of the 1960s, is the right solution for the 2030s and beyond.
“Following the recent passage of our city centre transport plan, council policy is clear that we will engage with the Scottish Government to seek action on addressing the legacy and ongoing impact of the M8 on the city centre. As the council’s transport convener, I have raised this issue with the Scottish Government directly in person, and most recently in detailed correspondence to start a formal conversation between the council, government and wider civic society.
“We need to explore immediate-term actions to reduce the impact of the M8, and secure Scottish Government support for longer-term work to explore feasibility for a potential transformation of the city centre stretch of the motorway. Other cities have replaced highways with lower-speed roads with greatly improved crossings for walking, wheeling and cycling, and have created vastly better and more joined up cities in the process – it’s time for Glasgow to start thinking big too.
“I look forward to the opportunity next week to discuss the work we have been taking forward, and to secure cross-party support for the council’s ongoing engagement with the Scottish Government on this issue.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel