THE Green minister charged with introducing Scotland’s deposit return scheme has insisted that no leader “with any credibility would seek to delay it”.
Circular economy minister Lorna Slater spoke out ahead of Scotland’s new first minister being installed next week – with all three of the candidates in the running to succeed Nicola Sturgeon having raised concerns about the scheeme.
SNP leadership hopeful and Scottish Finance Secretary Kate Forbes spoke out about the “economic carnage” that could be caused if the timetable for the scheme – which is due to come in on August 16 – was unchanged.
Fellow leadership candidate Ash Regan has also called for the initiative to be paused, with the third contender, Health Secretary Huzma Yousaf, having pledged a grace period for small firms.
READ MORE: Scottish Tories left red-faced as media BANNED from Tory spring forum
However Slater, speaking ahead of the Scottish Green Party conference, insisted that delaying the scheme could be “very, very damaging”.
She said firms had already invested more than £300 million ahead of deposit return coming in, adding the scheme was also creating hundreds of new jobs for Scotland.
“We’re looking to create 500 jobs, some of those have already be recruited for,” the minister stated.
“No-one with any credibility at this point would do anything to undermine that substantial investment that has been made by businesses of all sizes to get ready for deposit return.”
READ MORE: Creator of Grand Theft Auto video game joins SNP
When introduced, the scheme will see shoppers charged a 20p deposit on every drink they buy in a can or bottle, with that money then refunded to them when they return the empty containers for recycling.
And Slater said: “Those businesses that have committed to this, they need to see those 20ps start flowing so they can get their return on that investment.
“Businesses have invested in reverse vending machines, they only start getting the handling fees for those when those 20ps start flowing and those businesses need that money back.
“To delay that when businesses need that investment, would be very, very damaging.
“I don’t think anyone with any credibility would seek to delay it after all that investment has been made.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel