ONE of Scotland’s top lawyers and a frontbench SNP MP have become embroiled in a public spat over, errr, five missing grapefruits.
The Case of the Missing Citrus was highbrow from the very beginning.
It started after the SNP’s John Nicolson ordered a half dozen grapefruits from the Waitrose in London’s Barbican area, to be delivered by Deliveroo (presumably there were other items in the order as well).
But Nicolson was shocked to find that not everything he’d ordered arrived.
READ MORE: 'You take us for idiots': Tory MP Andrew Bowie called out on Question Time
“Hi @Deliveroo I just placed an order,” he wrote on Twitter. “Five items were missing. Within seconds your auto response says you won't refund. That's theft. How do I get a refund?”
It soon became clear that the five missing items in question were all grapefruits. And luckily, Joseph at Waitrose Barbican organised them to be delivered, apparently.
More than one KC replied to Nicolson’s original post clarifying that “when your delivery company fails to deliver all of the pieces of fruit which you have ordered that does not amount to a criminal offence of theft”.
But it was Roddy Dunlop, the actual dean of the actual Faculty of Advocates, who got the most wound up.
For the avoidance of doubt and in the interests of clarity, this MP’s accusation of theft relates to delivering one orange instead of six. That’s *exactly* the sort of thing we need our politicians to be highlighting. Chapeau, MrJohn. pic.twitter.com/oWe4RNhzez
— Roddy Dunlop KC (@RoddyQC) March 23, 2023
“For the avoidance of doubt, on no basis *at all* would this be ‘theft’,” Dunlop wrote.
“For the avoidance of doubt and in the interests of clarity, this MP’s accusation of theft relates to delivering one orange instead of six.
“That’s *exactly* the sort of thing we need our politicians to be highlighting. Chapeau, Mr John.”
He would later clarify that they were not in fact oranges, but grapefruits. In all, Dunlop went on quite the Twitter spree about the incident. It’s tiresome enough without quoting it all here. Suffice it to say, Nicolson took notice.
“Another busy evening on Twitter for the dean of the Faculty of Advocates,” the MP wrote. “Last night he was focussing on my breakfast citrus squeeze. He seems a little err… obsessed.”
Another busy evening on Twitter for the Dean of the Faculty of Advocates. Last night he was focussing on my breakfast citrus squeeze. He seems a little err… obsessed. pic.twitter.com/OVtyDrNNJ7
— JOHN NICOLSON M.P. (@MrJohnNicolson) March 24, 2023
“Not just that, but I quite clearly said it was grapefruit. Pink grapefruit. Not orange,” he added elsewhere. “The KC is just trying to appeal to his political base.”
Dunlop replied: “I’m not, John. But you do keep coming up on my timeline. With material that cries out for comment. (Indeed, I liked one of your tweets).
“I will try and bite my tongue, though, as you seem intent on subtweeting rather than engaging: which is, of course, a matter for you.”
Glad that’s cleared up then. We wouldn’t want anyone wasting their time on anything silly now.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel