SCOTS are being asked to join a campaign to stop the UK Tory Government from handing out “pollution permits” for nothing.
The Emissions Trading Scheme is supposed to reduce carbon emissions by making big polluters buy permits for each tonne of carbon they emit but many companies are being handed large numbers of permits for free.
Campaign group openDemocracy said the most recent free handout of permits was to airline companies who were given permits worth more than £300 million last year, while energy giants including Shell and BP were handed out free pollution permits worth £1 billion, with plans to give them billions more.
Now the group wants Scots to add their names to an open letter calling on Energy Secretary Grant Shapps to stop handing over pollution permits for nothing. They also want voters to contact their MPs about it.
“The more public pressure we can apply, the more likely it is we’ll put a stop to this scandal,” said a spokesperson. “Companies are racking up record profits while the rest of us struggle with rocketing fuel prices.”
The open letter reads: “Your Emissions Trading Scheme should reduce pollution by making polluters buy a permit for every tonne of carbon dioxide they emit. Instead you’re giving them free permits worth billions of pounds. We demand that you stop giving away Emissions Trading Scheme permits and instead make polluters pay.”
A consultation on a phase-out of the free permits for the aviation industry has been carried out but if any changes are made they will not take effect until at least 2026.
In the meantime, 12.2m free permits have been allocated over the next three years, worth a further £965m at last year’s carbon price.
The UK Government argues that this prevents “carbon leakage” when companies move to countries where they do not need to buy pollution permits but this risk is “minimal”, according to the UK Government’s own commissioned research.
A UK Government spokesperson said: “The UK is committed to tackling climate change while protecting our industry from carbon leakage. That is why a proportion of allowances are allocated for free to businesses under the UK Emissions Trading Scheme. This will support industry in the transition to net zero in the context of high global energy prices while incentivising long-term decarbonisation.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel