THE group behind proposals to build a golf course on protected sand dunes in the Highlands say their plan would “restore the area’s unique environmental features”.
Initial plans for the Coul Links golf course near the village of Embo in Sutherland were approved by Highland Council in 2018.
However, the Scottish Government stepped in to block the proposal in 2020 after a report found it was likely to have a negative impact on biodiversity.
Now a renewed proposal from community-led group Communities for Coul is being considered by the council – a move which walking charity Ramblers Scotland has described as “appalling”.
Ramblers Scotland has launched a petition calling for the plan to be rejected on grounds that it partially infringes on a Site of Scientific Special Interest (SSI), would damage the natural landscape, and impact access for walkers in the area.
READ MORE: Ramblers Scotland voices opposition to revived Coul Links development
But a spokesperson for Communities for Coul said that the 18-hole golf course would restore habitat in the area.
They said: “Our plans will in no way limit access for ramblers or other visitors who want to enjoy the natural beauty of Coul Links. In fact, they will make the site considerably more accessible for more people to be able to walk there.
“They have also been carefully drawn up with the aim of restoring the area’s unique environmental features, which are rapidly being destroyed by the spread of invasive species, reducing the distinctiveness and biodiversity of the dune system.
“Throughout the process of developing these completely new plans, we have focused on how best to address the environmental concerns that have been raised previously.
“We would be delighted to meet Ramblers Scotland to ensure they and their members are fully informed about our plans, which offer much-needed economic opportunities for our area.
“A community ballot held by C4C in June 2021 demonstrated a high level of local support for the plan, with a 44.4% turn-out and a 69.2% vote in favour.”
Communities for Coul say the updated plans reduce the amount of land developed within the SSI by around 90% and that the path of the course has been changed from the previous plan to avoid the most environmentally valuable areas of the sand dune.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel