ASH Regan said it was time for “a Braveheart, not faint hearts” as she claimed her opponents wanted to “stay in the straitjacket of the UK”.
The Edinburgh MSP said she would achieve Scotland’s exit from the Union in the immediate future, if elected as she insisted the best thing for the county’s economy was independence.
She had previously challenged rival Kate Forbes’s plans for the economy, which would focus on economic growth, branding it “trickle-down economics”.
This was the theory embraced by the right in the 20th century, which posited that wealth would “trickle-down” from the top of society to the poorest – though it is though by most left-wing economists to be unsound.
READ MORE: Unionists 'fear me' becoming the next first minister, says Kate Forbes
She said: “Trickle-down is a discredited economic policy which will not do anything for the communities in Scotland that are feeling left behind right now.
“These two candidates here want to stay in the straitjacket of the UK and Scotland cannot afford to stay in the UK any longer.
“We must get out of this Union and the best thing that we could do for the economy in Scotland is make sure that the Tories in London are not running it.”
Challenged on this by host Krishnan Guru-Murthy, who said independence was a “way off”, Regan insisted she would accelerate Scotland’s exit from the Union.
She said: “It’s not going to be a way off if I’m the leader of the SNP because I have a plan to get independence in the very short term.”
READ MORE: Kate Forbes and Ash Regan call out 'serial hustings attendees'
But her opponents accused her of having no economic plans of her own. She said investing in infrastructure would improve Scotland’s finances – something Humza Yousaf said was not possible given the budget passed recently.
Earlier in the debate, she accused her opponents of being “quite content” with devolution.
She said: “If we’re going to go for a new leadership and I think this is a time for a Braveheart and not faint hearts.
“And when people tell you who they are and they tell you that they’re not going to do anything about independence and they’re quite content with devolution, then people should listen to that.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel