KATE Forbes’s campaign has said she did respond to a pressure group after they accused her of lying about doing so.
During the Channel 4 SNP leadership debate on Thursday night, Forbes insisted she had responded to a letter from Back Off Scotland, a group which campaigns for anti-choice protests to be banned outside abortion clinics, despite Humza Yousaf claiming she had not.
I can confirm that Kate signed off the response and it was my error that it wasn’t sent until this evening. She spoke entirely in good faith as she always does. https://t.co/2dADXGfx3N
— Michelle Thomson (@MichelleThomson) March 9, 2023
The group took to Twitter to claim the Finance Secretary had “lied on national TV” after a response to the letter was sent around 10 minutes after Forbes made the claim.
READ MORE: Kate Forbes and Humza Yousaf neck-and-neck in latest leadership poll
Forbes's campaign said she had signed off on a response but it had not been sent on time in error and they had apologised to the campaign.
Michelle Thomson, who is involved with the Finance Secretary’s campaign publicly took responsibility for the blunder, tweeting: “I can confirm that Kate signed off the response and it was my error that it wasn’t sent until this evening. She spoke entirely in good faith as she always does.”
A spokesperson for Forbes said: "Kate had signed off on the letter and assumed in good faith it had been sent well before tonight’s debate.
“Due to an administrative error, the response had not been sent – though we can confirm it is now with Back Off Scotland.
“We would never seek to mislead the public and have issued our apologies to Back Off Scotland for this oversight.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel