THE firm behind the latest Scottish independence poll has “some tightening up to do”, a polling expert has said, after multiple errors appeared in its latest survey.
Redfield & Wilton Strategies – whose poll on Wednesday gave No a nine-point lead over Yes – was called out for consistently spelling both the Scottish Health Secretary and Scottish Secretary’s name wrongly, among other issues.
READ MORE: SNP's stance on monarchy 'must be debated at future conference', campaigners say
Pollster Mark McGeoghegan said the firm also failed to include a Yes/No crossbreak in the tables. This would normally allow a glimpse into perceptions among people who voted for or against independence in 2014, but is missing from the Redfield & Wilton polling.
McGeoghegan further criticised the listing of the term “transgenderism” as a political issue. He said that such loaded language should not be used in polling.
McGeoghegan wrote: “Firstly, unlike almost everything else there, ‘transgenderism’ isn’t a policy issue. Gender recognition is a policy issue.
“Secondly, it’s a pejorative term. We shouldn’t be using non-neutral language in polls.”
He added that it was “not an acceptable shorthand for lots of reasons”.
It was pointed out that Humza Yousaf’s name was misspelled as Yousef “in every tweet and graphic, every time he’s mentioned in their blog post, and throughout the tables”.
Also, Alister Jack’s name was misspelled as Alistair.
“There’s some tightening up to do if this is going to be a monthly tracker,” McGeoghegan said.
Redfield & Wilton Strategies has been approached for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel