MSPs could not agree on whether legislation that would make changes to Scotland’s bail system should proceed to the second stage of scrutiny.
Members of the Scottish Parliament’s Criminal Justice Committee were split on whether the Bail and Release from Custody (Scotland) Bill should continue through Holyrood.
It comes as a report by the committee on the legislation said that organisations such as Women’s Aid and Rape Crisis Scotland must be given “necessary reassurances” from ministers over the planned changes.
READ MORE: Emma Harper has email privileges suspended after breaking SNP rules
The SNP MSPs on the committee, Fulton MacGregor, Rona Mackay, Audrey Nicoll, and Collette Stevenson, all agreed to the general principles of the legislation.
However, Labour MSP Katy Clark and Tory MSPs Russell Findlay and Jamie Greene did not, as they believed there was “a lack of sufficient explanation about the bill’s intended purpose and effects”, as well as how it would be delivered.
Pauline McNeill, Scottish Labour MSP, said the legislation should only proceed “if Ministers address the issues outlined by Members not supporting the general principles”.
Part of the legislation would see the repeal of current laws which means bail can only be granted in exceptional circumstances in serious cases of violent, sexual or domestic abuse, where the accused person has a previous conviction for such crimes.
But the committee noted that organisations representing the victims of crime were “not convinced” by this.
Giving evidence, Scottish Women’s Aid stated that this could allow “convicted repeat and serial abusers of domestic abuse, including those who have perpetrated sexual assaults against women and who present a particular danger to women’s safety” to be granted bail.
The organisation added: “Given women’s experiences of abusers being given bail, women need as much protection as the law can afford them.”
Meanwhile, Rape Crisis Scotland told the committee it had “significant concerns” at the removal of “an important safeguard”.
READ MORE: Kate Forbes rejects idea her leadership would see SNP 'shift right'
MSPs said that as “organisations representing the victims of crime are not convinced by the repeal”, the Scottish Government “must have dialogue with them to provide the necessary reassurance regarding the impact of the repeal”.
The bill aims to change the way remand is used by the courts, so accused people are only sent to prison ahead of a trial where they pose a risk to public safety.
It also looks at the release arrangements for prisoners, with the aim of improving the rehabilitation and reintegration of offenders back into the community.
With social workers being given an enhanced role in cases where bail is being concerned, some councils expressed concerns that the Scottish Government has under-estimated the resources required for this.
SNP convener Nicoll said: “The bill would make a number of changes to the bail and release system in Scotland and it is fundamental that the rationale for these changes is made clear, and that detail of how these changes will be delivered and resourced is outlined.
“It’s now up to parliament as a whole to decide whether this bill proceeds.”
READ MORE: Rishi Sunak mocked for Twitter QR code bungle
Tory justice spokesman Greene, one of the three MSPs who were opposed to the bill, said the “highly critical” committee report “makes it clear that victims are once again an afterthought for the SNP government”.
Greene argued: “The Bail and Release Bill as it stands risks letting out thousands of criminals who pose a serious threat to the public by tying the hands of judges in their decision making.
“Organisations representing victims made it clear to the justice committee that narrowing the grounds for bail will inevitably lead to more criminals being freed to reoffend and traumatise victims.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here