ASH Regan has said that she would refuse to return the Stone of Destiny to England for King Charles’s coronation.
The SNP leadership hopeful said she would stop the transfer of the ancient artefact should she become first minister, saying that it needs to stay in its “rightful place”.
This comes after Alex Salmond told Sky News he doesn’t think the Scottish Government should allow the historic stone – famously stolen by the English in 1296 – to be returned to Westminster.
The stone was officially returned to Scotland in 1996, taking its place in Edinburgh Castle’s Crown Room.
READ MORE: Full interview with Kate Forbes on independence and key priorities
Prior to this, the stone was stolen in 1950 by Scottish students who left it on the altar of Arbroath Abbey, where it was later taken back to London.
Following the announcement of the date for Charles’s coronation, a debate over where the stone should be kept resurfaced with more than 3000 people signing a petition calling for it to remain in Scotland.
Speaking to the Scottish Mail On Sunday, Regan confirmed she would block its transportation if made first minister.
She said: "While I appreciate the tradition of using the Stone of Destiny in the coronation, I believe it should remain in Scotland as an ancient symbol of our national heritage.
“I suggest a compromise in which the aspects of the coronation ceremony involving the stone take place in Scotland so that it can be celebrated in its rightful place, without needing to be removed from the country.
“This would be a fitting tribute to the stone’s significance in Scottish history, while still honouring the traditions of the United Kingdom of the crowns.”
Her comments enraged Conservative external affairs and culture spokesman Donald Cameron who said: “Ash Regan’s parroting of Alex Salmond’s nonsense really is the silliest appeal to the extremes of the nationalist movement.
“Anyone who knows anything about the stone’s history can see why it is appropriate for it to be at the King’s coronation and will see it as a mark of Scotland’s importance in a great event for the whole of the United Kingdom.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel