HUMZA Yousaf has said he would embed LGBT + rights in a written Scottish constitution.
Speaking to LGBT+ news site PinkNews, Yousaf said that he would not just defend the rights of LGBT people but “absolutely advance them in a progressively, socially just Scotland”.
He vowed to secure the rights of minorities in a written constitution if Scotland gains independence.
“That would help to cement them, so that when we do have the inevitable attacks on our rights, we have a concrete foundation by which to defend them,” he said.
“Far too often, we are held back by a UK Government that who want to roll back on some of these rights.
“That’s not the kind of independent, socially just, progressive Scotland that I see.”
READ MORE: Is renewables a more diverse industry than oil and gas?
When asked whether there was “institutional inertia” in dealing with transphobia within the party in relation to the Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill, he said that he would not stand for “hatred of any sort” as first minister.
While he believed that the “vast majority” of SNP politicians opposed to the legislation expressed themselves without being transphobic, he added that he would be prepared to expel anyone who crossed the line.
He said: “There is a job for the next SNP leader to do, which is to try to bring the party together over what has been a very divisive debate.
“There’s a process whereby if anybody is being bigoted, transphobic, homophobic, misogynist, racist, that that is investigated, and appropriate action [taken] which, of course, could be expulsion.
“All we’re trying to do is make life that little bit easier for a tiny marginal percentage of the population who are often targeted with hate crime.
“It’s a real shame that it has become an unbelievably toxic debate and some of the dog whistles I’ve heard against our trans community – if you took out the word ‘trans’ and put in ‘Muslim’ or ‘Jew’ or ‘Black person’ we would not stand for it.”
He added that as well as fighting the UK Government’s Section 35 order, he would also look at bringing forward a bill which bans conversion therapy practices in Scotland if similar UK-wide legislation is not forthcoming from Westminster.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel