KATE Forbes has said that her proposals are “not at all” a shift away from the SNP’s “progressive agenda”.
This comes after one of the Finance Secretary’s rivals in the race to become first minister, Humza Yousaf, said on Tuesday that he believed in a “wellbeing economy” as he encouraged candidates to support the policies that have taken the party’s support to “dizzying heights”.
“I think it would be foolish to abandon that”, he said.
When asked about Yousaf’s comments, Forbes said that she agreed with the Scottish Health Secretary and added that her proposals were “not at all” a shift away from the ideals he spoke about.
READ MORE: Energy bills: Why does Scotland pay more than England?
She told the PA news agency: “I think it is very progressive to believe in the inherent dignity and humanity of every human being in Scotland and to ensure that when they need care, and when they need medical assistance, they can access that free at the point of need.
“If we’re serious about eradicating poverty, which I am, if we’re serious about reinvesting in our public services, which I am, then we need a growing and prosperous economy.
“You cannot eradicate poverty and reinvest in our public services at the level that we need to if we don’t have a growing and prosperous economy.
“This is about profits with purpose. It’s about growing an economy with a view to reducing poverty in Scotland and reinvesting in our public services.”
Forbes spoke to journalists as she visited the Highland Home Carers in Inverness on Wednesday.
She also said that the National Care Service should be decentralised and pledged to raise pay for carers to £15 an hour.
READ MORE: Call for Alister Jack to be sacked amid claim he 'misled' Parliament
Meanwhile, on Wednesday morning, Yousaf said that he is committed to backing a rise in council tax on second homes should he win the SNP leadership race.
A hustings event is set to take place in Cumbernauld this evening which will be live-streamed on the SNP’s social media channels following a row over media access.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel