NICOLA Sturgeon has said Scotland “is a socially progressive country” amid a row over SNP leadership candidate Kate Forbes’s comments on equal marriage.
Forbes, a member of the Free Church of Scotland, lost some of her high-profile supporters this week after she said she would not have voted for gay marriage “as a matter of conscience”.
Elsewhere, the MSP said having children outside marriage “would be wrong according to my faith” and is something she would personally “seek to avoid”.
Criticism over Forbes’s views has led to debate over the role of religion in politics, with the Free Church accusing some of “anti-Christian intolerance”.
Fellow candidates Humza Yousaf and Ash Regan – who will formally launch her campaign on Friday – have declared their support for same-sex marriage in light of Forbes’s comments.
Regan said she is “proud” same-sex marriage is legal in Scotland, while Yousaf insisted he would not use his Muslim faith as a basis for legislation.
READ MORE: RECAP: Kate Forbes to keep fighting amid calls for her to quit race
Sturgeon had vowed to keep out of the race to find her successor, but was asked about Forbes’s comments by the BBC on Wednesday afternoon.
“What kind of a legacy is being left for now given what Kate Forbes has said on progressive politics, and a socially progressive Scotland?” the First Minister was asked.
The SNP chief responded: “Scotland is a socially progressive country and I believe that is majority opinion.
“Whoever is first minister the views that they have on all sorts of issues matter because people look to their first minister to see someone who will stand up for them and their rights and the job of first minister on a daily basis involves responding to things based your positions your values, your outlooks.”
She was also asked about the impact of the row on the SNP – and whether the party was tearing itself apart.
“No, it’s not,” she said.
“It’s having a democratic election so that’s what is happening.
“The candidates are standing for the top job in Scotland. I know what is entailed in that job, I’ve done it for more than eight years and therefore that debate should be respectful, it should be civilised, it should be thoroughly positive.
“But anybody standing to be first minister has to expect that their positions, and their policies, and their outlook on things will be scrutinised. That is in the nature of democracy, and that’s a good thing in democracy. I know all of the candidates standing well and I know they’ll all embrace that.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel