THREE in five Scots believe Nicola Sturgeon made Scotland a better place, according to a new poll.
In a wide-ranging snap survey carried out by Ipsos following the First Minister’s resignation earlier this week, 59% polled said Sturgeon had changed Scotland for the better, while 31% said she had made it worse.
But 54% said her resignation would harm the case for Scottish independence – a figure which fell slightly to 49% among Yes voters.
On her record in government, the picture was more mixed. While 60% said she had done a good job of making Scots feel more proud of their country, just 28% said she had done a good job improving the country’s NHS.
READ MORE: Rising star Mairi McAllan 'considering SNP leadership bid'
Some 46% of those polled said she had done a bad job with the health service.
Her record on climate change came out more favourably, with 49% saying she had done a good job on taking action on the climate crisis, and the same saying she had maximised Scotland’s influence on global issues.
Only 30% of Scots thought Sturgeon had done a good job improving the education system – with 43% saying she had done a bad job.
Ipsos said these issues in particular would pose thorny challenges for her successor.
The polling also looked at who the country would like to see replace Sturgeon as first minister.
Kate Forbes – who is yet to announce whether she will stand – came out in the lead, with 31% saying she would do a good job.
John Swinney – who has ruled himself out of the race – came second, while 30% said they though Scottish Labour Anas Sarwar would make a good first minister.
Many expected to run appeared to face problems with name recognition, with marginally more people saying they did not know who Forbes was versus those who thought she would be a successful FM.
READ MORE: BBC accused of 'bizarre stunt' after 'uninviting' SNP from Question Time panel
Some 39% of those polled did not know who Constitution Secretary Angus Robertson was – with 24% saying he was cut out for the top job.
Humza Yousaf had, among the SNP politicians listed, the highest number of people saying they thought he would do a bad job as first minister, with 37% saying he was not up to the task.
But Scottish Tory leader Douglas Ross suffered even worse numbers in this regard – with most Scots (58%) saying he would make a bad first minister.
Emily Gray, managing director of Ipsos in Scotland, said: “These new results taken the day after Nicola Sturgeon’s resignation underline that her successor faces a hefty in-tray, with the public critical of Scottish Government performance on the NHS and education in particular.
“Although Kate Forbes emerges as the preferred choice among the possible contenders as First Minister, followed by Angus Robertson, name recognition for both of them is currently limited.
“Three in ten of the public say they don’t know who Kate Forbes is and four in ten say the same of Angus Robertson.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel