PETER Murrell must go as SNP chief executive in the wake of the First Minister’s resignation, an SNP MP has said.
Joanna Cherry, the party’s most vocal internal critic, has called for Murrell to follow Nicola Sturgeon – who he married in 2010 – after her shock resignation.
Murrell has served as the party’s chief executive since 1999 and has presided over its rise to the dominant force in Scottish politics.
But as the man responsible for the day-to-day running of the party as a business, he has faced serious questions – most recently over a £107,620 loan he made to the SNP which broke three political finance rules.
READ MORE: Douglas Ross digs into Nicola Sturgeon with pointed statement after her resignation
As Sturgeon’s husband, he is a member of the outgoing First Minister’s inner circle – something Cherry said must preclude him from a senior position within the party as it begins the process of electing a new leader.
She tweeted: “The SNP leadership and party management have been deeply bound together.
“I cannot see any circumstances in which Peter Murrell can continue as chief executive under a new leader who must be free to choose a successor. Meantime we need a neutral caretaker CEO.”
Sturgeon thanked her husband during her resignation speech, saying he was her “rock” during her time in office.
She said: “There will also be time in the days to come for me to say thank you to a very long list of people, without whom I wouldn’t have lasted a single day in this job, let alone eight years.
READ MORE: John Curtice delivers verdict on why Nicola Sturgeon stepped down as First Minister
“I won’t do so today – I might inadvertently forget someone or, perhaps more likely, start to cry.
“But there are a couple of exceptions. Firstly, my husband and family. Few people understand the price families of politicians pay for the jobs we choose to do. Mine have been my rock throughout.
“And, of course, the SNP. Since I was 16 years old, you have been my extended family. Thank you for the honour of being your leader.”
The SNP were approached for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel