The SNP are calling on the UK Government to “put its money where its mouth is” on carbon capture funding after a Scottish project was “snubbed”.
Westminster leader of the SNP Stephen Flynn MP has written to Prime Minister Rishi Sunak calling for immediate funding for the Acorn project in North East Scotland following what the party described as continual delays from Westminster.
The Acorn project, said to be critical to decarbonising Scotland’s industry, involves carbon capture and storage and hydrogen infrastructure projects proposed for the St Fergus gas terminal north of Peterhead in Aberdeenshire.
Flynn said the Acorn project was “snubbed” in 2021 in the Track 1 stage of funding for carbon capture sites in favour of sites in England and was instead only given “reserve” status.
In his letter to the Prime Minister, Flynn said this was a “complete and utter betrayal of our energy sector, our Net Zero ambitions and our corner of the world” and called for funding for the project.
READ MORE: SNP's Ivan McKee: Winning a de facto referendum is the only option
He said: “Given the undoubted importance of hitting Net Zero, and the obvious deliverability of Carbon Capture Utilisation and Underground Storage (CCUS) in the North East, your lack of investment is incomprehensible and it is imperative that funding for Acorn is announced as soon as possible.”
Speaking ahead of a visit to St Fergus on Monday, Flynn said “the time for warm words is well and truly over”.
He said: “The UK Government must finally announce funding for the Acorn project, without further delay and stop holding back jobs and investment in the north east.
“Westminster has taken £400 billion from Scotland’s natural oil and gas resources, and it’s high time they gave something back.”
READ MORE: LGBT History Month: Meet the families who found their space
He added: “It’s time the Tory government put right the wrongs of the past, and put its money where its mouth is on carbon capture funding.
“By continually delaying this crucial investment, the Tories have shown exactly why Scotland needs independence.
“Only with the full powers of independence, can Scotland unleash its potential and create a fairer energy system that works in the interests of Scottish industry and our economy.”
The UK Government has been asked for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel