CHARITIES, experts, and politicians have spoken out against the BBC after one of its most senior journalists suggested that some children are “willingly” trafficked.
Home editor Mark Easton was speaking on BBC Radio 4’s Today programme on Thursday morning about the letter sent to the Prime Minister by more than 100 charities which said Home Office policy of keeping young asylum seekers in hotels was “both unlawful and harmful”.
“Almost two years into the operation of the scheme, which is both unlawful and harmful, it is no longer possible to justify the use of hotels as being ‘temporary’,” the letter stated.
Easton began by explaining the charities’ position on the some 4600 asylum-seeking children and young people who are being housed in hotels.
He went on to talk about the difficulties in identifying who is really a child and who may be lying to the UK Government about their true age.
The BBC home editor went on: “These aren’t nine and 10-year-old little kids who are going missing. What they are almost entirely is 16 – or people who claim they’re 16 or 17 – and they are Albanian males.
“People from Afghanistan, Egypt, India, Vietnam, Pakistan, and Turkey have also gone missing. Thirteen are under 16 years of age. Only one of all of the 440 who’ve gone missing are female.
READ MORE: Charities in call for 'urgent action' on over 200 'missing' children
“I’ve spoken to someone at the National Crime Agency and what they say is that they absolutely recognise the issue here.
“These young people are often trafficked, sometimes willingly to be honest. They come knowing that they are going to be employed by criminal gangs in the UK, and they do.
“They disappear from hotels – they’re not locked up – they disappear as soon as they are able and then they often are found working in car washes or in cannabis farms. So there’s the difficulty.”
Absolutely appalling coverage on the 100s of vulnerable children missing from Home Office hotels in Kent on @BBCr4today
— Gemma Abbott (@gem_abbott) January 26, 2023
Apparently we don’t need to worry because they’re not *proper* kids, they’re Albanian teenagers who have probably been “willingly trafficked”
What. The. Hell? pic.twitter.com/VeBmfJetxD
A clip of the report was shared on Twitter by lawyer and campaigner Gemma Abbott, who invited people to complain to the BBC about the “horrific coverage”.
“Absolutely appalling coverage on the 100s of vulnerable children missing from Home Office hotels in Kent on @BBCr4today,” she wrote.
“Apparently we don’t need to worry because they’re not *proper* kids, they’re Albanian teenagers who have probably been “willingly trafficked”. What. The. Hell?”
Politicians, charities, and experts responded with outrage to Abbott’s call.
The Helen Bamber Foundation, which works with survivors of trafficking and torture and was one of the more than 100 charities to sign the letter to the government about the Home Office hotels, also urged people to complain to the BBC.
“Just awful reporting from @BBCr4today,” the foundation wrote. “Two hundred unaccompanied children remain missing after being unlawfully housed in Home Office-run hotels. Whatever their nationality, they are still CHILDREN and cannot consent to being trafficked.”
Dr Grace Robinson, an expert in child criminal exploitation and the founder of Black Box Research and Consultancy, added to the calls to complain.
She wrote: “This is gross. Well done @BBCMarkEaston, your irresponsible reporting upholds the racist and dehumanising narrative that sees Albanian CHILDREN left in innumerable desperate situations – of which you couldn’t even begin to comprehend.”
READ MORE: Scotland's arts sector loses millions in funding due to Brexit, analysis finds
Dr Ella Cockbain, an associate professor at UCL and an expert in trafficking, wrote: “This coverage is appalling @BBCr4today. It’s misinforming the public, furthering anti-Albanian rhetoric, minimising harms to extremely vulnerable children and young people, and detracting from state failures to protect them.”
Hywel Williams, the Plaid Cymru MP for Arfon, commented (originally in Welsh): “BBC Home Affairs Editor Mark Easton speaks – in case you thought he was one of the wild men of the paranoid right.”
Commentator Owen Jones echoed Williams, writing: “I listened to this thinking the BBC had invited some head of a right-wing fringe organisation to go on some rant, and then they didn't properly challenge him. Oh no, I was wrong, it's actually the BBC's home editor.”
The BBC declined to comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel