MSPs have been urged not to back a UK Government bill which poses a “danger to devolution”.
The warning from the Scottish Greens comes with the Scottish Parliament set to vote on whether to consent to the Tory government’s plans to legalise certain genetically modified (GM) foods for the UK market.
The Conservatives have had plans to legalise “genetically edited” (GE) foods in the UK since Brexit, and their Genetic Technology (Precision Breeding) Bill is nearing its final stages at Westminster.
Under EU law both GM and GE foods were banned, but the Tories plan to legalise GE – or “precision bred” – foods. Their bill defines GE foods as having alterations made which could have resulted from “traditional processes” or “natural transformation” – although there are numerous caveats.
READ MORE: Warning of 'trucks rolling over Border' as England plans to legalise GM food
There are no plans to ask producers to label GE foods, and rules in the post-Brexit Internal Market Act mean that anything created and sold in England can also be sold in Scotland.
The Greens warned the result of the Tories' bill would be “untested, controversial, and unlabelled gene-edited plant and animal products” on Scotland’s shop shelves.
SNP Environment Minister Mairi McAllan has lodged a motion asking MSPs to refuse consent for the Tory bill. The motion, if passed, will further call for the bill to be altered “in order to properly respect devolved responsibilities”.
Sections 42 to 48 of the Tory bill explicitly apply to Scotland, despite food standards and agriculture being devolved. Section 42 specifically would allow the UK Government to make regulations which “modify legislation” in Scotland.
Scottish Green MSP Ariane Burgess (above) said: “Once again, the UK Government is threatening to override our parliament's wishes by allowing UK ministers to rewrite devolved Scottish regulations which relate to their bill. This is the same government that is also allowing gene-edited products from the rest of the UK to be sold in Scotland via the Internal Market Act.
“It is part of a wider Westminster power grab, which is undermining our democracy and environmental standards.
“Devolution cannot work when we are constantly being overruled by a reactionary Tory government that is wedded to a deregulated post-Brexit Britain where rules can be ditched at the whim of ministers.”
Labelling the bill a “danger to devolution”, Burgess went on: “Many of us hoped that we had stopped this kind of meddling with nature long ago, but this bill would undo a lot of that work and would introduce genetic modification through the backdoor. It could be a big leap backwards for animal welfare and consumer standards.
“The Scottish Parliament should have the powers to make the decisions that it sees fit to protect the environment and the public, and this bill undermines that. It is another example of the continued mission creep of the Westminster government over devolution.”
McAllan’s motion, which is likely to pass with the support of the Greens and SNP, says that the Scottish Parliament “agrees not to give consent to the Genetic Technology (Precision Breeding) Bill, and calls on the UK Government to amend the bill to restrict the geographical application of clause 42, or to otherwise make it a requirement for it to seek the consent of the Scottish Ministers when making provision within the legislative competence of the Scottish Parliament, in order to properly respect devolved responsibilities”.
READ MORE: Gene editing should be embraced by Scotland, says Alister Jack
The UK Government spokesperson said: “Precision breeding technologies, such as gene editing, have great potential and can help us reduce pesticide use, lower costs to farmers, increase food production and adapt to the impacts of climate change.
“This bill will remove unnecessary red tape inherited from the EU in order to create a simpler and more proportionate regulatory regime so that we can support our farmers to grow more resistant, more nutritious, and more productive crops and position the UK as a world leader in research and innovation.
“We will continue to work closely with the Devolved Administrations to develop this policy in a coordinated way. We are keen that all parts of the UK have the ability to unlock the potential of these technologies and are having ongoing discussions to manage any divergence.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel