AN overwhelming majority of Scots believe Prince Andrew should be stripped of his Scottish title, a new poll commissioned exclusively for The National has revealed.
The Find Out Now survey found that a whopping 72% of the country thinks the scandal-hit royal should have his Earl of Inverness title removed.
Just 7% of respondents said Andrew should keep his Scottish title, with 16% responding don’t know and 4% opting not to say.
While he is widely known across the UK as the Duke of York, in Scotland the Prince has been known as the Earl of Inverness since 1986 when the Queen gave him the title on his wedding day.
READ MORE: Prince Andrew 'furious as taxpayer-funded bodyguards to be taken away'
But following accusations of sexual assault – which Andrew denies – and his friendship with the late billionaire paedophile Jeffrey Epstein there have been mounting calls for the King’s brother to relinquish the honour.
A Change.org petition to have the Earl of Inverness's title removed from the disgraced royal received more than 11,000 signatures last year.
It followed the public trial in which the Earl paid out millions to settle a civil sexual assault case against Virginia Giuffre.
Giuffre sued Andrew for allegedly sexually assaulting her when she was 17 after she was trafficked by Epstein. Andrew denies the claims and says he has never met her.
Inverness MP Drew Hendry told The National that the public mood across the Highlands was clear.
He said: "It's important to remember that his own mother, the late Queen, decided he was not fit to hold the titles he previously had, and she, herself, took most of these away.
“It would be very hard to find anyone in Inverness, or the wider Highlands, who thinks Andrew should hold onto his titles, especially 'Earl of Inverness'.”
The Prince has already had several of his royal titles removed after he stepped down from public life.
Last year the late Queen stripped him of all of his honorary military roles, including Colonel of the Grenadier Guards, and he gave up his HRH style.
Hendry continued: “He's already had an honorary position as President of Inverness golf club revoked, but there is no public power to take this Earl title away.
“It is entirely in his own hands. He should follow the example set by the late Queen and realise that it is not appropriate to retain these remaining titles"
Highland MSP Emma Roddick said the strength of feeling on the issue went beyond age and party lines.
The SNP politician said: “Most people will be unhappy that he is associated with Inverness and Scotland, perhaps even regardless of their wider view on the Royals.
“However, the monarchy by definition means that we do not get a say in who represents us, even who our head of state is.
“We must be able to vote people out when we want to.”
Graham Smith, CEO of the campaign group Republic, said the Prince is clearly “toxic” in Scotland.
He told The National: “It’s no surprise that Scottish people don’t want to be associated with Prince Andrew.
“He is toxic and his name has become a by-word for royal sleaze. He remains accused of serious offences and while he maintains his innocence, he has yet to fully cooperate with law enforcement.
“It’s been reported Andrew wants to return to public life, but clearly he should be instead be withdrawing further, losing those last titles he retains.
“I can’t imagine anyone in Inverness wants their town associated with this man, or for that matter anyone in Scotland.”
READ MORE: Politicians unite in fresh calls to strip Scottish title from Prince Andrew
The National poll comes amid reports in The Sun on Sunday and Mail on Sunday that the late Queen’s son is considering a legal bid to overturn Giuffre’s civil abuse case.
Andrew is reportedly “considering legal options” after Giuffre’s sex abuse case against US lawyer Alan Dershowitz fell apart.
LBC reported that the Prince is hoping such a move would allow him back into public life.
It also comes as disgraced socialite Ghislaine Maxwell said the well-known photo showing the Duke of York next to Giuffre is fake.
Maxwell, 61, who was convicted of sex trafficking, has previously cast doubt on the authenticity of the photo, said to be taken inside her Mayfair home, showing Andrew with his arm around Giuffre, and Maxwell in the background.
Speaking from prison in the US, Maxwell, who described Andrew as a “dear friend”, said she is “sure” the picture is not real.
But Our Republic, a group that campaigns for an independent Scottish republic, suggested Scots have already made their mind up on the Earl.
READ MORE: Anger over Prince Andrew's Scottish title amid Counsellor of State backlash
A spokesperson for the group said: “There aren't many things that you can get everyone to agree on, but Prince Andrew has managed to nail down one.
“After being gifted Inverness as a wedding present from his mum he has united the people of Inverness against him as he stained the reputation of the city by association.
“After all he has done it is probably too much to expect him to do the right thing and abandon his titles, but we should be able to expect his family to have some respect for the people they claim to lead by stripping him of them, and prevent the stain marring their communities any longer. Inverness deserves to be free of him.
“Cities are made by their people, and those people have a right to decide who represents them. Never again should the privilege of that station be traded between a fading aristocracy as gifts."
The polling was carried out by Find Out Now for Electoral Calculus on behalf of The National.
Between January 11 to 18 this year, 1098 Scottish adults were interviewed for the survey.
Buckingham Palace has been approached for comment.
Take advantage of our free subscription offer to get full access to the news stories, analysis, and everything else we have to offer.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel