SINCE the 2014 independence referendum, we have seen two kinds of "shocks" in our politics that have coincided with increased support for Scottish independence. There are one-off events that propel constitutional politics to the forefront of the public consciousness and slower shifts in perceptions of the competence of Scotland’s two governments.
How have the polls changed since then?
The Brexit vote in 2016 was followed within a week by three polls showing Yes ahead, as the prospect of Scotland’s majority Remain vote being subsumed by England’s narrow Leave majority pushed the constitution to the top of the political agenda.
But within a month, that sharp shift had melted away, and the polls were back to where they had been for many years, with a series of single-digit No leads.
During the height of the pandemic, in late 2020, the burgeoning Yes lead was beginning to stretch into the double digits as Scots’ perceptions of the competence with which the Scottish and UK governments were dealing with the most acute crisis the country had faced in decades sharply diverged.
READ MORE: Independence, Brexit, the monarchy: New poll series starts TODAY
Over time, however, as the vaccine roll-out accelerated and the 2021 Scottish Parliament election campaign kicked into gear, the Yes lead diminished. By the time we reached the election, we were back to polling that looked more like the pre-pandemic status quo.
A key question on the minds of pollsters, academics, and activists as Yes took an average lead of 4.4 points in December 2022 was whether this was a Brexit-like shock, a pandemic-like shock, or a shift with greater staying power than either.
The Scottish Election Study’s Dr Fraser McMillan found that sentiment may have begun to shift before the Supreme Court verdict. His analysis of their November Scoop poll, conducted before and after the verdict, suggested that the shift towards Yes resulted from a mix of the immediate effect of the UK Supreme Court verdict and diverging evaluations of Scotland’s two governments in the wake of the Truss-Kwarteng fiscal fiasco.
And a new poll for The National, conducted by Find Out Now, suggests that the current upswing in support for independence may have greater staying power than that generated by the EU referendum shock.
Conducted between January 11 and 18, almost entirely before the UK Government’s Section 35 order, Find Out Now found Yes leading on 52% (up one point since early December), with No on 44% (also up one point). The number of undecided voters fell slightly from 6% to 3%.
In statistical terms, this represents no significant change in Scottish voters’ constitutional preferences since early December. It is, however, the joint second-highest level of support for independence ever recorded.
If we look across the polls since the UK Supreme Court decision, Yes leads by an average of 3.7 points. In the two months before that decision, Yes trailed by an average of 2.1 points. Across 2022 until Liz Truss became Prime Minister, Yes trailed by an average of 3.1 points.
'Not insignificant'
Over a year, three prime ministers, four chancellors, and umpteen crises, average constitutional preferences across the polls have swung in the independence movement’s favour by 6.8 points. That is not an insignificant change.
At the same time, not all polls have Yes ahead. A Savanta UK poll in December, and a Survation poll this week both had No ahead. There remain questions about the size of any Yes lead and how long it may last, if at all.
Those questions grow larger now that the compound drivers creating it have been joined by the UK Government’s Section 35 order blocking the Scottish Parliament’s Gender Recognition Reform Bill from royal assent.
READ MORE: 'Absolute disgrace': Alister Jack snubs Holyrood committee invite
We generally expect most Scots to disapprove of the UK Government doing practically anything in Scotland – at least, that’s what years of polling have taught us to expect. Even if the GRR is unpopular, the UK Government’s attempt to veto it may prove even more unpopular.
In that case, one of two things may happen – either support for independence will be reinforced at its current level or given another boost.
Only time will tell how the events of the past few months will effect our constitutional politics, but for now, there’s all to play for.
Mark McGeoghegan is a postgraduate researcher at the University of Glasgow. The views expressed are his personal and academic opinions
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel