THE rise of agriculture in northwest Europe may have spelled the beginning of warfare and violence in the neolithic era – a period previously thought to be “marked by peaceful co-operation”, an Edinburgh University study has found.
The research suggests that the rise of growing crops and herding animals as a way of life, replacing hunting and gathering, may have laid the foundations for formalised warfare.
The findings come after researchers used bioarchaeological techniques to study human skeletal remains from sites in Denmark, France, Germany, Great Britain, Spain and Sweden.
READ MORE: Tory MP scolded for 'seriously bad taste' tweet about staff member
Of the skeletal remains of more than 2300 early farmers from 180 different sites – dating from around 6000BC to 2000BC – more than one in 10 displayed weapon injuries, potentially caused by frequent blows to the head by blunt instruments or stone axes.
Dr Linda Fibiger, senior lecturer in osteoarchaeology at Edinburgh University, said: “Human bones are the most direct and least biased form of evidence for past hostilities and our abilities to distinguish between fatal injuries as opposed to post-mortem breakage have improved drastically in recent years, in addition to differentiating accidental injuries from weapon-based assaults.”
The team – from the Universities of Edinburgh, Bournemouth and Lund in Sweden, and the OsteoArchaeological Research Centre in Germany – also found several examples of penetrative injuries, thought have been caused by arrows.
READ MORE: 'Urgent' appeal launched to raise funds to save historic paddle steamer
Researchers believe the findings could even suggest larger-scale violence and the destruction of entire communities, as some of the injuries were “linked to mass burials”.
The peaceful nature of neolithic European society has been the subject of heated debate among pre-historians, as more evidence suggesting violence has slowly emerged since the 1980s, starting with the discovery of an early neolithic mass grave at Talheim, Germany in 1983.
Dr Martin Smith, of Bournemouth University’s department of archaeology and anthropology, said: “The study raises the question as to why violence seems to have been so prevalent during this period.
“The most plausible explanation may be that the economic base of society had changed.
"With farming came inequality and those who fared less successfully appear at times to have engaged in raiding and collective violence as an alternative strategy for success, with the results now increasingly being recognised archaeologically.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel