A SENIOR former UK Government official has said they're “nervous” about how the blocking of gender legislation would go down with soft-Unionist Scots.
Speaking to Politico, the official stressed that the “comms need to be calm” and ensure that the move is a legal rather than a political one.
However, some Scottish Tory MSPs have broken ranks to back the bill in Holyrood, including Jamie Greene.
READ MORE: Gender recognition reform: Section 35 order is UK's 'nuclear option'
He penned a letter to Rishi Sunak saying that blocking the legislation would be a “gift” to the independence movement.
Meanwhile writing in The Herald, former Scottish Tory adviser Andy Maciver said that blocking the bill would be an act of “constitutional vandalism” and would “hand Scottish nationalists another tranche of soft Unionists on a silver platter”.
Elsewhere, the Tory Reform Group said last night that vetoing the bill was a “deeply concerning development”, warning that “transgender and non-binary lives across the country are at risk of being used to play political games”.
The bill intends to make it easier for trans people to obtain a Gender Recognition Certificate by removing the need for a diagnosis of gender dysphoria, lowering the age threshold for applications and reducing the time applicants need to live in their acquired gender.
During the amendments stage, a change was made to the rules to allow 16 and 17-year-olds, which requires them to live in their acquired gender for six months while for over 18s it is only three.
Labour leader Keir Starmer has already sparked backlash after contradicting his MSPs during a Sunday broadcast media round.
He was accused of promoting Tory myths about the bill when he said he had “concerns” over some of the legislation.
A judicial review could potentially be launched against the Secretary of State’s ruling.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel