RISHI Sunak has said he is waiting on “final advice” over whether to intervene and block gender reform legislation passed by the Scottish Parliament last month.
MSPs voted overwhelmingly and with cross-party support to simplify and shorten the process of changing gender in the country.
However, the UK Government has said it is considering blocking Royal Assent of the Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill and preventing it from becoming law due to concerns over how it would interact with UK-wide gender legislation.
When asked by the BBC whether his government was intending to make the move to prevent devolved legislation from becoming law in Scotland, Rishi Sunak said he was still seeking advice on how best to proceed.
He said: “Obviously it’s a sensitive area. As is completely standard practice, when the Scottish Parliament passes a law it’s completely normal for the UK Government to take advice on the impact of that law across the UK and then consider how best to proceed.
READ MORE: What happened at the anti-gender reform protest at Holyrood
“That’s the process that’s underway at the moment. I think that’s entirely reasonable and standard so that’s where we are.
“What I’m concerned about is the impact of the bill across the United Kingdom. These questions kind of slightly demonstrates that there may be impacts across the UK that we need to be aware of and understand the impact of them and that’s what we’re doing.”
Section 35 of the Scotland Act 1998, entitled “Power to intervene in certain cases”, authorises the Secretary of State for Scotland to make an order prohibiting a bill from being submitted for Royal Assent.
However, the SNP’s leader at Westminster Stephen Flynn said that an intervention by the UK Government would raise questions about the nature of democracy in Scotland.
He told the BBC on Friday: “This is not just a question about the GRR [Gender Recognition Reform Bill], people’s individual views on it. This is about democracy.
“The Scottish Parliament has voted in favour of legislation that sits within devolved competencies, and it’s incumbent upon Westminster to ensure that legislation is passed in full.”
They included members of the Scottish Family Party, Unionist Clubs Scotland, and activists who have previously spread misinformation about Covid-19 vaccines on social media.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel