THE press watchdog has received scores of complaints about an article published in The Spectator which was criticised as anti-Scots “hate speech”.
Ipso, the independent press regulator, told The National on Thursday morning it had received a total of 33 complaints about Rod Liddle’s piece “Help me, I’m Scottish”, published last week.
It is understood most complaints have alleged problems with accuracy or discrimination.
Because Liddle refers to himself as a “chippy, grasping, salad-dodging smackhead” in the piece after discovering he has mostly Scottish DNA, it is unlikely complaints will hold up on the grounds of discrimination.
The Ipso editors’ code bans publications from printing “prejudicial or pejorative” references to “an individual's race, colour, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation or to any physical or mental illness or disability” and any mention of these characteristics at all “unless genuinely relevant to the story”.
But it does not mention offensive references to groups of people more broadly.
READ MORE: FMQs suspended as oil protester shouts from public gallery
The article caused a furore – with some critics accusing the magazine of promoting hate speech against Scottish people.
Liddle wrote that his only “consolation” upon discovering he was genetically more Scottish than English was that he would “henceforth … expect everybody else in England to subsidise me through their taxes, while simultaneously demanding total independence from them”.
Ian Fraser, a former Sunday Herald journalist, tweeted his outrage at the piece: “I suppose Rod Liddle and the Spectator editor [Fraser Nelson] thought this was amusing. To me, it seems more like hate speech.”
Richard Haviland, a former civil servant in the Foreign Office who has spoken in the past about how he has become a reluctant Yes supporter, also called the article “hate speech” adding that it gave “ammunition to the worst of the English and the worst of the Scots”. He added that Liddle was involved in the “deliberate stirring up of mutual hatred” between the two countries.
The most-complained about article in Ipso's history was Jeremy Clarkson’s column about Meghan Markle, published last year, which generated in excess of 20,800 complaints, reports the Press Gazette.
It displaced The Scottish Sun’s “Death Express” front page on the Stonehaven derailment tragedy, which racked up 16,860.
The Spectator was approached for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel