SCOTLAND'S LibDem leader has claimed a Ukrainian refugee returned to Kyiv for treatment because the wait to see a GP in Scotland was so long.
Scottish Liberal Democrat leader Alex Cole-Hamilton raised the case as he challenged Nicola Sturgeon problems in the health service during First Minister’s Questions on Thursday.
He said that last year, one in six people who were not able to secure a GP appointment carried out a procedure on themselves or had someone else do it.
The LibDems would not provide further information on the refugee in question when contacted.
Cole-Hamilton claimed: “Maria is 22 years old. She is a Ukrainian refugee who has been living in Scotland since the summer.
“She suffers from a hormonal thyroid condition which requires regular testing and treatment.
“But when she presented to her new GP, she faced an unexpected dilemma.
“The wait was so long that it actually made more sense for her to risk travelling back to a war zone to see her doctor in Kyiv, and so she did.
“The air raid sirens, the drone strikes and the cruise missile attacks of the Ukrainian capital were less daunting to Maria than the wait for treatment on Scotland’s NHS. That is appalling.
“These are the risks that people are taking for the sake of their health, and all for the want of basic access to primary care.
“Can I ask the First Minister, is she embarrassed by this?”
READ MORE: The people of Ukraine are clear - everywhere here is on the frontline
Sturgeon said she did not know the specifics of the case Cole-Hamilton was referring to.
She added: “We again continue to support general practice.
“There are more GPs per head of population in Scotland than anywhere else in the UK – 83 GPs per 100,000 population here compared to 63 in England, 63 in Wales, 75 in Northern Ireland.”
A further 3000 staff have been recruited for wider multi-disciplinary teams in primary care, she said.
The First Minister continued: “Access to GPs like access to other areas of the health service right now is challenging – and very challenging for some patients – and we continue to work to address that.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel