THE SNP’s most senior MP has said a victory for the de facto referendum should include votes for any party prepared to stand in the next General Election on the issue of Scottish independence.
Pete Wishart also warned the de facto referendum will be a “massive gamble” for the independence campaign, but the only other option is to “give up” and have constitutional deadlock continue.
The MP for Perth and North Perthshire also discounted the idea of attempting to dissolve Holyrood and call an early Scottish election for the de facto referendum, saying this would only lead to a backlash and “First Minister Douglas Ross”.
READ MORE: Greens say de facto referendum a 'last ditch' move
The SNP’s national executive committee (NEC) is meeting on Saturday to decide on preliminary details of the strategy, which will be debated at a special party conference in March.
Writing in The National, Wishart said: “A de facto referendum is just about the worst possible way to settle the constitutional future of Scotland. Let me also put it another way.
“A de facto referendum is now the only way we’re going to be able to settle the constitutional future of Scotland.”
He went on: “Nothing like this has ever been tried in a western democracy before and the risks are huge.
“If we fail to pull it off we may surrender our leading position in Scotland and could possibly kill any hope of independence being secured in a ‘real’ generation. It is a massive gamble, with the emphasis on massive.”
READ MORE: SNP announce date for independence strategy conference next year
However the MP for Perth and North Perthshire said the Supreme Court ruling that Holyrood does not have the power to hold a referendum and the UK Government refusing to agree to a vote left the question of what else can be done.
He added: “Something has to give in the current constitutional deadlock and unless and until we are able to demonstrate to the UK (and the rest of the world) that a majority of the Scottish people want to see Scotland become an independent nation that deadlock will continue to dominate our politics.
“A move has to be made and in the face of UK intransigence it is incumbent on us to move the pieces and push this forward."
*Read Pete Wishart's full article in The National, online and in print, tomorrow*
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel