THE opposition is gunning for Humza Yousaf’s scalp but refusing to address the Brexit elephant in the room, as Scotland’s NHS faces its most difficult winter on record.
The Health Secretary was asked if he was “out of his depth” at the First Minister’s press conference in Edinburgh on Monday, setting the tone for the comments which flooded in from Unionist parties following the statement on the NHS crisis.
Labour’s Jackie Baillie demanded he is sacked, the LibDem described Yousaf as “beleaguered” and the Tories called for him to scrap the Scottish Government’s plans and adopt theirs instead.
READ MORE: First Minister says Scotland's hospitals are 'almost completely full'
Defending her Health Secretary at the press conference, the FM intervened and spoke on Yousaf’s behalf, arguing that he is “doing a very good job in very difficult circumstances” and claimed he had the toughest job in government.
Yousaf was visibly exhausted at the conference and had dark circles under his eyes, while he flanked the FM along with Deputy Chief Medical Officer Graham Ellis and BSL interpreters.
The scene set out by the FM wasn’t pretty - the NHS is facing multiple mounting pressures and is on the brink.
Covid is still causing issues, there has been a rise of other diseases including Strep A, higher demand on emergency departments, and delayed discharges are causing waiting times to shoot up, leaving ambulances languishing at the doors of A&E departments across the country.
There are staffing issues, as both Unison and the Royal College of Nurses pointed out, there simply aren’t enough qualified healthcare workers to fill the posts needed. There are also nurses' strikes looming, with 82% of RCN members voting against the Scottish Government’s latest pay offer.
With a fixed budget, talks have stalled, but a walk-out could bring a struggling NHS to its knees.
“We have no more money this year,” the FM said when she was asked about averting strike action and the impact on patients, and pointed out that NHS pressures are not unique to Scotland.
She added: “We are facing very, very severe staffing constraints, not just in the health service, but across the public services and across society generally right now, that have been significantly and there's no getting away from this, significantly exacerbated by the ending of freedom of movement as part of Brexit.
“So it is much harder to recruit staff into the National Health Service.”
The UK Government announced similar plans to the FM’s, with Downing Street announcing that they plan to “buy” additional care home beds to create at least 3000 new places to provide extra capacity.
READ MORE: SNP challenge Labour to join forces to stop Tories anti-strike law
But how effective can this be when the underlying issues, like the exodus of staff due to Brexit and years of austerity and cuts imposed on the health service, aren’t being tackled at the source?
The FM said that in a “relative sense” NHS Scotland is dealing better with pressures than elsewhere but added, “that is of less importance than the experience of patients in Scotland right now”.
Earlier in the week Baillie had insisted that the Army should be brought in as a sticking plaster for the winter months, but the calls were rejected by Yousaf who argued the armed forces were “not a panacea”.
This is another empty suggestion that holds no solution - Army reservists are already pulling shifts in health boards across the country.
Alex Cole-Hamilton, Scottish LibDem leader, tweeted his fury at Sturgeon and Yousaf addressing the press without speaking to MSPs first - despite the fact that they both mentioned on numerous occasions there would be a ministerial statement on the first day back from recess.
With the Westminster Tories tiptoeing towards privatising the NHS and Labour’s Keir Starmer appearing to follow suit once again, it could be argued that the Scottish opposition party's time would be better spent trying to find constructive solutions rather than politicking over the most serious issue to face our health service in its history.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel