BEING a “steadfast friend” to the rest of the UK should be the “single biggest objective” for a newly independent Scotland, a former MP has insisted.
In a blog for UK In a Changing Europe, Stephen Gethins has said beyond regaining EU membership, a leading priority for an incoming Scottish foreign secretary should be to reassure the UK that Scotland cares about being an ally.
Gethins – who was once the SNP’s spokesperson for Europe and international affairs – added that investing in diplomatic resources and potentially setting up a public diplomacy campaign for England could even help Scotland in its journey to secure EU membership.
He said: “Given public opinion, one of the first priorities would be for Scotland to seek EU membership at the earliest opportunity.
READ MORE: Westminster Accounts shows secretive firm gifted Labour MPs cash
“That said, the immediate priority of a newly established Scottish foreign ministry would lie within these islands.
“After independence, it will be important to reassure the UK that Scotland remains a steadfast friend and ally.
“That would be the single biggest objective of an incoming Scottish Foreign Secretary and would help unlock other potential challenges.
“Scottish Ministers would be at pains to reassure the UK that it had ‘lost a surly lodger and gained a friendly neighbour’.
“That would require an investment in diplomatic resources as well as a campaign of public diplomacy to reassure a potentially sceptical English public.
“That would also assist in securing EU membership. The Scottish Government could even argue it could act as a bridge to the UK to help rebuild EU/UK relations since it would be, along with Ireland, the member state with the closest links.
READ MORE: Thousands sign Scottish petition against monarchy's secret lobbying
“That may not be simple. Some in the UK and EU will sense an opportunity to bring the UK closer to the Single Market, since it will now have two land borders with the EU, and Scottish independence will have dealt another blow to an already creaking Brexit project.
“Independence will trigger a difficult debate in England about its own place in the world with consequences for its neighbours.”
Given the UK’s ongoing divergence from the EU, Gethins said different foreign policy visions were emerging in Holyrood and Westminster, with opinion polls indicating that the choice between different unions and distinctive global outlooks are among the “primary catalysts” for independence.
While he insists the twin challenges of securing EU membership and maintaining friendly relations with the rest of the UK will be the most significant priorities post-independence, he did also use his blog to emphasise the importance of Scotland taking security responsibilities seriously, with Nordic neighbours watching the constitutional debate closely.
READ MORE: Alba Party billboard on M80 covered up with Rangers ultras graffiti
Gethins added: “In the aftermath of the war in Ukraine, Scotland will want to show that it takes its security responsibilities seriously. For the EU states bordering Russia, that will be even more important than Scotland’s relationship with England.
“In many areas of foreign policy an independent Scotland would seek inspiration from its neighbour to the south-east, Ireland. However, on security, Scotland’s Nordic neighbours in the north west provide the most useful template.
“Scotland’s strategically important location means these allies will be watching the debate carefully: Scotland would commit to early membership of NATO, and need to illustrate it takes threats to European democracy seriously.
"On Trident, it is unlikely that the UK would want to leave its entire nuclear arsenal on the territory of another sovereign state, and negotiations would be undertaken swiftly to ensure their removal as quickly as safety allows.
“Scotland will be well-placed to contribute to broader European security priorities such as food and energy. But further afield, Scotland would need to learn to prioritise.
"That means streamlining and working with others in terms of embassies and consulates and crucially Scotland needs to decide where it brings added value as a fully-fledged international actor.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel