TORY MSPs deployed every “cynical” strategy in their playbook in a bid to push gender reform legislation into the long grass – and it’s working.
On Tuesday, it took over an hour for MSPs to finally get to the first batch of amendments on the agenda, after Tory MSPs repeatedly raised points of order and other excuses. When it came to voting on amendments, they forced through every single one – even those from proposers who had decided not to move them, with a range of Tory MSPs moving them in their stead before they inevitably fell.
At one point, they forced a vote on whether or not to include “and” in a sentence.
Tories also insisted on forcing a vote on each of their own amendments, despite the likelihood that they would fall. It almost felt as if we were watching Westminster.
READ MORE: LIVE: Day two of Scotland's gender reform begins after marathon debate
By Wednesday, this tactic was still in play. The session was suspended for an hour while the Presiding Officer (PO) considered a request from Tory MSP Rachael Hamilton to allow further consideration of a legal ruling.
MSPs were given the deadline of December 12 for lodging any amendments to the gender reforms, but a day later Lady Haldane (in the Court of Session) ruled that “sex” is not limited to biological or birth sex in a decision relating to gender representation on public boards.
The PO pointed out Hamilton could have requested this over the course of the past week, and refused to allow the discussion to go ahead.
Scottish Tory leader Douglas Ross also ended up in a row with deputy presiding officer Liam McArthur over the PO’s decision.
Two MSPs from other parties told The National they believed Ross was trying to get himself thrown out of the Chamber, but a cool-headed McArthur warned he was “skirting close to contempt of Parliament” and told Ross to “move on”. Immediately afterwards, Roz McCall, one of Ross’s MSPs, called another point of order on the timetable.
Parliamentarians were spotted making late-night calls to their families during one of the comfort breaks, as the lengthy debate began to grind on some MSP’s nerves.
READ MORE: Did MSPs vote 'to allow sex criminals to change gender'?
One MSP told The National: “I’ll stay here all f****** night if I have to get this through, the Tory tactics are ridiculous, but we will get it passed.”
Another agreed, and claimed that the PO and her deputies were furious at Ross and his party’s tactics making a “mockery” of the Scottish Parliament.
One MSP fumed that the Tories were embarking on “shithousery” and claimed Hamilton’s attempt to extend proceedings were part of an extended bid to wreck the bill.
The Greens were particularly outraged. Maggie Chapman, who staged interventions and spoke against numerous amendments during the lengthy debates, said that the Tories should be “ashamed” of their “cynical and transparent” conduct.
She added: “It’s not an accident. They’ve known exactly what they are doing. It is yet another insult to our trans siblings, who have already been the target of vicious smears and disinformation.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel