A BY-ELECTION will be held next year in Edinburgh following the shock resignation of a senior SNP councillor.
Former Lord Provost Frank Ross stepped down last Friday after serving more than 10 years on the council.
His decision came less than 24 hours after a City Chambers meeting where the SNP group abstained from a vote on whether businesses in the Roseburn area disrupted for months by roadworks should be helped financially by the council – a move Ross previously backed as the local councillor.
A by-election to fill the vacancy in Corstorphine/Murrayfield will take place within three months of the resignation. Although the date hasn't been announced by the returning officer, the ballot will be held before Friday, March 17.
READ MORE: Gender debate used as ‘proxy’ for transgender discrimination
The LibDems, who got half of all first preference votes in Corstorphine/Murrayfield at May's council election, will hope to snap-up a third seat in the ward.
And if successful, the total number of councillors in the group – which would be 13 – would be equal to Labour, who currently control the council.
Ross is yet to comment publicly on why he has left his role.
Council sources speculated his resignation was linked to the decision by his group's leadership to not vote with the Conservatives and LibDems in favour of compensation for traders impacted by extensive construction works in the former councillor's ward.
READ MORE: John Nicolson calls for Jeremy Clarkson to be removed from ITV
Adam McVey, the SNP's group leader, said: “I'd like to thank Frank for his work over more than a decade on the council. He's been a tireless campaigner for the communities of Corstorphine/Murrayfield, as well making huge achievements leading the city's economic development and then becoming only the second SNP Councillor in Edinburgh's history to serve as Lord Provost. We wish him very well for the future post-council.”
A council spokesperson said: ”A by-election to fill the vacancy has to take place within three months of the resignation and the date will be determined by the Returning Officer.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel