THE head of the UK Civil Service will look into whether Scottish officials should still be allowed to work on indyref2 preparation, according to Alister Jack - despite a Tory minister suggesting the Scottish Government can legally spend money on anything it likes.
Cabinet Secretary Simon Case and senior civil servants are discussing the issue with John-Paul Marks, the Scottish Government’s permanent secretary, Jack said.
Meanwhile, Tory peer and minister Malcolm Offord asserted that funding from the UK Treasury to the Scottish Government comes “with no strings attached” during a Scottish Affairs Committee hearing at Westminster.
Offord – who was handed a life seat in the Lords by Boris Johnson so he could take on a vacant ministerial role at the Scotland Office – was challenged at the committee by the SNP’s shadow leader of the House of Commons Deidre Brock.
READ MORE: Unionists in legal bid to block Scottish Government spending on independence
The SNP MP asked Offord and Jack about claims from Unionist politicians that it may be illegal for the Scottish Government to spend money in reserved areas – such as preparations for independence.
Those claims have been taken further by the Unionist campaigner and entrepreneur Robert Kilgour, who is preparing a legal bid in an attempt to prevent the Scottish Government spending in reserved areas.
Brock brought up comments from Professor Aileen McHarg, a professor of public law and human rights at Durham University, who called the claims of unlawfulness “ludicrous”.
Offord (below) appeared to agree that the Scottish Government was free to spend money wherever it liked.
“The UK treasury sends money to Scotland with no strings attached,” he said.
“It’s not bifurcated … the UK Government doesn’t do that. It sends it to the Scottish Government and lets the Scottish Government make its own decision as to how it feels best it should spend that money.”
However, Jack then said he would like to “clarify” the point, claiming it was a “matter for the civil service”.
“I think on this one I would hold fire until we see how this plays out,” the Scottish Secretary said.
Jack’s comments seemed to have an eye on an intervention from Tory MSP and constitution spokesperson Donald Cameron.
Cameron has written to John-Paul Marks, the permanent secretary to the Scottish Government, asking him to assess whether the forecasted spend of £20 million on indyref2 preparation is “lawful”.
It was not the only time at the committee that Offord and Jack appeared slightly at odds.
Chaotic scenes at the Scottish Affairs Committee as Tory MPs INSIST they have a mandate to govern in Scotland pic.twitter.com/EhDUPTfFPW
— The National (@ScotNational) November 28, 2022
SNP MP Mhairi Black asked the pair if they accepted that the “Conservative Party have not received a mandate from Scotland since 1955”.
Jack began to answer, but was shouted down by Offord.
“No, no, because it’s within the rules of the United Kingdom constitution and within those rules we all four of us are together,” the peer said.
Jack attempted to give his own answer, trying to stop Offord talking to do so, but was unable to speak over his colleague.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel