PRINCE Andrew is furious after being told he will lose his personal police protection - which costs the taxpayer nearly £3 million a year, according to reports.
A source told the Sun on Sunday that ministers informed the Duke of York, known as the Earl of Inverness in Scotland, that his taxpayer-funded security detail will be removed next month.
King Charles is believed to be keen to distance himself from his younger brother and keep him out of the public eye.
READ MORE: Man who heckled Prince Andrew during funeral cortege escapes court appearance
Andrew, the late monarch’s disgraced second son, stepped down from public life after the furore over his friendship with paedophile billionaire Jeffrey Epstein, and paid millions to settle a civil sexual assault case to a woman he claimed never to have met.
In January, ahead of his legal settlement, his mother Queen Elizabeth stripped him of all of his honorary military roles, including Colonel of the Grenadier Guards, and he gave up his HRH style.
Andrew, a former Royal Navy officer who served in the Falklands War, retained his rank as a Vice Admiral.
The Prince is said to be angry over the loss of his armed police protection and may make an appeal to the Metropolitan Police and the Home Office over the move.
The bodyguards escort Andrew when he leaves the royal estates of Windsor but there has been anger from some over the use of any taxpayer cash spent on the royal during a cost-of-living crisis.
READ MORE: Anger over Prince Andrew's Scottish title amid Counsellor of State backlash
One senior Labour MP told the newspaper: “He doesn’t seem to understand that he’s in disgrace and people don’t want to hear from him any more — especially him with his begging bowl.
“I know he has a title, but that doesn’t mean he is entitled to taxpayer-funded protection.
“I know families who don’t know if they will be able to afford their kids’ Christmas presents this year."
The Home Office said: “It is our long-standing policy not to provide detailed information on protective security.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel