THE Aberdeen Independence Movement (AIM) has issued a statement condemning “efforts to incite harassment” towards one of its co-chairs.
On Wednesday evening, AIM held a rally following the Supreme Court ruling regarding indyref2.
In a post on social media they hit out at that the spread of “misinformation” about the event.
Writing on Twitter, AIM said: “We condemn in the strongest possible terms the deeply concerning efforts to incite harassment toward AIM co-chair, Fatima Joji from a group of extremists who claim to be supportive of our cause.
READ MORE: Sheku Bayoh's sister speaks of racist abuse before inquiry resumes
“We wish to confirm that anyone who volunteers their time with us has the right to be and feel safe. This is a matter we take very seriously.”
The statement continued by saying that “false claims” were made by an anonymous Twitter user about the organising of the event.
It added: “The consequence of spreading vitriol and misinformation has led to police involvement and action relating to a hate crime being pursued because of credible threats to Fatima’s safety.
“In an effort to dispel harmful misinformation we would like to publicly clarify two points due to the severity of this case:
“1. At no point was Fatima involved in any organising, processing, vetting or disallowing any speakers or attendees of the rally.
⚠️ PUBLIC STATEMENT following police advice:
— Aberdeen Independence Movement (@AIMAberdeen) November 24, 2022
We condemn in the strongest possible terms the deeply concerning efforts to incite harassment toward AIM Co-chair, Fatima Joji from a group of extremists who claim to be supportive of our cause. 1/7
“This narrative is absurd and entirely untrue. As per a request from a particular individual, Fatima made an enquiry to the organising team regarding the availability for speakers on the evening of the rally.
“After sourcing that information, Fatima then relayed it to the individual who had initially enquired.
“The fact of this appears to have been misconstrued for reasoning we will not tolerate.”
The rally on Wednesday evening was one of a number which took place across both Scotland and Europe after the Supreme Court ruled Holyrood cannot legislate for a second indyref without Westminster’s consent.
The statement continued: “We have a team of organisers involved with AIM. Fatima is the co-chair for our organisation and is not a member of the organising team.
“We have a duty of care to Fatima and all members of our team. We do not tolerate any form of abuse, harassment, or any threat to their safety and will take police advice on this matter and any necessary steps going forward.”
A police spokesperson said: "Following a report of an alleged communications offence in Aberdeenshire, enquiries have concluded and no crime has been established."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article