SENIOR figures in Rishi Sunak’s government are reportedly considering putting the UK on the road to a Swiss-style relationship with the EU.
The Sunday Times reports that the move could take place over the next decade as the Government eyes up a closer relationship with the EU that avoids the current barriers to trade.
Any such shift, only a few years after Boris Johnson secured a deal with the EU after years of negotiations, would likely inflame backbench Tory Brexiteers.
However, Downing Street has rejected the report with Health Secretary Steve Barclay telling Sky News, “I don’t recognise this story at all”.
READ MORE: Scottish cities being hit hard by the cost of living crisis
He added that Sunak supported Brexit, and that it was important to use “Brexit freedoms” in various “high growth areas”.
The Times suggested that, behind closed doors, some in government have indicated that the pursuit of a frictionless trading relationship with the bloc requires moving to a Swiss-style arrangement.
Switzerland and the EU have a close economic relationship based on a series of bilateral agreements, giving the country direct access to parts of the EU’s internal market including the free movement of people.
Barclay added: “We’ve got a Prime Minister who himself supported Brexit. I myself did and was Brexit secretary and worked very hard to maximise our control of our laws, our borders and our money.
“So, it’s absolutely important, particularly in those high-growth sectors, such as financial services, life sciences and the green industries, that we really use the Brexit freedoms we have.”
Asked about the Swiss-style relationship, he said: “Well, I didn’t support that. I want to maximise the opportunities that Brexit offers.”
Chancellor Jeremy Hunt admitted that Johnson’s Brexit deal caused damaging trade barriers with the EU, as he said immigration will be “very important” for the economy.
Hunt also insisted the UK would find a way to improve trading ties with the EU without re-joining the single market.
Barclay admitted that since Brexit there have been “difficulties” with “greater friction” over trade.
Asked on Sky News whether Brexit has had an adverse impact on UK trade, Barclay said: “What I’m saying is you’ve got to look at the issues in terms of Brexit in the round.
“There are areas where there have been difficulties in terms of greater friction and we’re looking to work constructively with EU partners on that.
“But equally, there are very significant opportunities as a result of Brexit. I don’t think we would have done the vaccine rollout in the way that we did had we remained a member of the EU and the significant regulatory opportunities we have, and the autumn statement signalled our determination to take those.”
Elsewhere, Labour’s shadow work and pensions secretary Jonathan Ashworth said Labour does not want the UK to re-join the EU’s single market.
READ MORE: Supreme Court: Scotland-wide events to take place on day of verdict
He told Sky News: "We’re not proposing returning to the single market or the customs union, or anything like that.
“But we do want to negotiate a bespoke deal for the United Kingdom, so that our businesses can export, so that we can get those agreements on agriculture, so we can work together on security issues.
“But we’re not proposing that we just simply adopt the Swiss proposal, which the Government now are apparently looking at.
“Of course, we need to fix this deal. Of course, we need to make Brexit work, because this oven-ready deal that we were promised, this great deal, has not worked out in the way in which Rishi Sunak and Boris Johnson told the British people that it would do.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel