TRANSPARENCY reforms in the Scottish Government will see ministers accused of bullying or other inappropriate behaviour named and shamed, the deputy first minister has announced.
The current policy – which has been criticised by First Minister Nicola Sturgeon – gives anonymity to senior politicians accused of misconduct, even if complaints against them are upheld.
Under the new procedures, ministers who are subject to complaints from civil servants will be named, with decision reports and judgments published in instances where complaints are fully or partially upheld.
READ MORE: Ian Blackford 'facing SNP Westminster leadership challenge'
Any reports published as a result of a complaint will be redacted to ensure the complainer cannot be identified, the Scottish Government said.
For those where the complaint is not upheld, a minister’s name and the outcome will be published for six months on the Scottish Government’s website.
Decisions made in complaint procedures which have already concluded will not be published, the Scottish Government has said.
“The First Minister advised the Scottish Parliament in June that the ministerial code and complaints procedure would be updated with regards to future complaints,” said John Swinney.
“The Scottish Government is determined to build a culture in which concerns are addressed early and in which all those who are involved with a complaint have confidence and can engage constructively and fairly in the process.”
READ MORE: Lonely Planet names Scottish region as one of the best world locations to visit
The planned changes will come into effect by the end of the year.
In June, Sturgeon said she was not comfortable with the previous procedure and had instructed legal advisers to look at making the process more transparent.
Former SNP minister Fergus Ewing was named by the Daily Record as being the subject of a bullying probe, but under the current rules has never been officially confirmed as being under investigation.
Ewing has previously denied the accusations and because the new rules will not apply retrospectively, they will not be confirmed officially.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel