A NEW report has found that 45 per cent of Scotland’s wealth is held by just 10 per cent of households.
Research by the Fraser of Allander Institute at the Strathclyde University also showed that incomes have experienced “unprecedented stagnation” since 2010 which has had a negative impact on health inequalities.
Published on Monday, the Health Inequalities in Scotland report explores trends in Scotland since 1999 in the key factors that influence health.
It showed that living standards in Scotland have stalled dramatically since 2010 and have affected the health of the population as a result.
READ MORE: Appeal to send Aberdeenshire teen to Transplant Games in Australia
A tenth of households has no or negative wealth. Wealth can influence health through the way it affects financial and housing security, the report argues.
Inequalities in earnings, income, wealth and education remain relatively high in Scotland compared to the past and to other comparable European countries.
It argues that factors including financial security, the quality of housing and the local environment, education, and employment, can affect health in many ways.
Living in damp or overcrowded accommodation can affect health directly, while financial security can affect mental wellbeing, and influence people’s ability to engage in healthy behaviours.
Typical weekly earnings in Scotland were found to be around £80 per week below what they would have been had long-running trends before 2010 continued.
The report is part of a programme to better understand health inequalities in Scotland and the wider determinants of health.
David Eiser, deputy director at Fraser of Allander Institute and author of the report, said: “Scotland’s economy, like the UK’s, has been characterised by high levels of inequality for many decades.
"Since 2010, the economy has also been characterised by stagnating earnings growth and flatlining living standards.
“The health of the population, and health inequalities within the population, are shaped by social and economic circumstances.
“The similarities between Scotland’s economic and health trends are striking.
“Stagnation of improvement in incomes and living standards has coincided with a slowing of improvement on some health outcomes, including life expectancy and healthy life expectancy, and an increasing prevalence of mental health issues.
“The links between the economy and health are complex and work both ways.
“We’ve seen this in the context of Covid (where socio-economic circumstances influenced vulnerability to the disease), and the current cost-of-living crisis – which has the potential to affect health in a number of ways.
READ MORE: Henry McLeish prompted by research to call for action on alcohol ads
The work has been funded by the Health Foundation working with Scottish research partners and an expert advisory group.
David Finch, assistant director at the Health Foundation, said: “Today’s report represents a comprehensive attempt to map and assess trends in a wide range of the socioeconomic determinants of health in Scotland including incomes and poverty, wealth and debt, employment and education, housing and more.
“Across these areas the message is clear. Inequalities are high, and progress has slowed.
"Addressing socioeconomic inequalities and improving living standards will be key to making meaningful progress towards improving the health of Scotland.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel