A SCOTTISH minister has urged the UK Government to rethink its bill to overhaul EU legislation – and urged Holyrood to fight the proposed law.
The Scottish Government has lodged a Legislative Consent Memorandum urging Holyrood to withhold its consent for Westminster’s Retained EU Law (Reform and Revocation) Bill.
The bill seeks to revoke over 2400 pieces of EU legislation that were included in the UK statute book at the end of the Brexit transition period.
READ MORE: Scotland 'needs more borrowing powers for cost-of-living crisis'
And now Constitution Secretary Angus Robertson has written to the UK Business Secretary Grant Shapps detailing the Scottish Government’s reasoning for recommending that Holyrood refuse consent.
Robertson’s letter has echoed the fundamental opposition of Scottish ministers to the legislation and stressed the concerns of bodies like RSPB Scotland and Greener UK, who say the bill will “derail urgent action to tackle the nature and climate crisis” and “rip up our most important nature protections in Scotland”.
The Scottish Government has committed to aligning regulation in Scotland alongside that of the EU and has asked that Westminster reconsider the bill and its impact on devolved governments.
The letter said: “This bill puts at risk the high standards people in Scotland have rightly come to expect from EU membership.
"The UK Government appears to want to row back 47 years of protections in a rush to impose a deregulated, race-to-the-bottom, society and economy. This is clearly at odds with the wishes of the vast majority of the people of Scotland who will be dismayed at the direction the UK Government is taking our country.”
It goes on to say the legislation “significantly undermines devolution”.
It continued: “By allowing UK Government ministers to act in policy areas that are devolved, and to do so without the consent of Scottish ministers or the Scottish Parliament, is in direct contradiction to the intent of the devolved settlement.
"Despite repeated assurances from UK ministers that the Sewel Convention would be respected, changes to the bill that would ensure respect for devolution have so far been resisted by UK Government.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here