A BBC reporter who used inflammatory language about immigrants during a report on Channel crossings has admitted to a “poor” choice of words, the broadcaster has said.
Michael Keohan, a political reporter with BBC Kent, compared immigration to a battle in a controversial broadcast on Thursday morning, saying the country was “defending” itself from waves of migrants arriving on the English south coast.
Unbelievably inflammatory rhetoric by BBC reporter Michael Keohan
— 🇮🇹Fórcola🏴 (@Frcola1) November 3, 2022
“The Home Secretary has come to Dover to see for herself how the UK is defending itself on the front line against migrants”
How is framing it as a war in any way appropriate? @Ofcom#BBCNews #BBCYourQuestions pic.twitter.com/uZOGmsIoG3
Now the BBC has said the correspondent has expressed regret over his reporting.
A spokesperson said: “The reporter acknowledges that during a live insert for BBC News his choice of language was poor."
Keohan drew ire after a clip of his report was shared on social media, with Twitter users branding his comments “disgusting”.
READ MORE: BBC presenter 'failed to meet impartiality standards' with Tory leadership race comments
Speaking in Dover ahead of a visit from Suella Braverman, the reporter said: “This will be one of the places the Home Secretary will come to see for herself exactly how the UK is defending itself on the frontline against migrants.”
One user said he was framing the asylum crisis – which has seen people detained for lengthy periods in overcrowded camps – “as a war”.
It comes after Braverman was condemned for comparing the arrival of asylum seekers in Britain to an “invasion”.
She made the comment one day after a far-right extremist carried out a terrorist attack at an immigration centre in Kent, throwing petrol bombs at the site before taking his own life.
The Home Secretary visited the Manston immigration centre – which has been the centre of disease outbreaks and overcrowding – on Thursday.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel